Yeah, you can say that, in the same way that Long isnt very good, nor was Pelle or Mane.
They had patches of not scoring, but they've been known to score for us so it's not really the same.
As for Long, he isn't a very good striker if we're talking about putting the ball behind the net, but he's there for his other skills. You might argue the same for Redmond, but I think Long's contribution on the pitch is more tangible than Nathan's. But then, that's just me.
