All you have to do is to watch the news and you will see that a Brexit person will simply make a statement of we will do this, however there is never much reasoning to how they would implement such policies. For example no-one has said how we will be able to fulfill a trade deal with the Eu without doing a Norway and having all their rules including freedom of movement.
As for population I cannot see us agreeing a decent trade deal without keeping the freedom of movement rules.
As for restrictions on products sold to the EU. All the "red tape" such as dimensions and safety regulations will have to be applied to anything on its way to being sold in the Eu.
Most foreign investors say that they back us remaining with some saying they may have to build new factories in other Eu countries if we leave.
The head of the bank of England is in my view the most qualified man in Britain to talk about financial effects of Brexit. If that's not enough there are many financial and economic bodies from the treasury to the London school of economics saying that leaving would be very costly.
All you have to do is to watch the news and you will see that a Brexit person will simply make a statement of we will do this, however there is never much reasoning to how they would implement such policies. For example no-one has said how we will be able to fulfill a trade deal with the Eu without doing a Norway and having all their rules including freedom of movement.
As for population I cannot see us agreeing a decent trade deal without keeping the freedom of movement rules.
As for restrictions on products sold to the EU. All the "red tape" such as dimensions and safety regulations will have to be applied to anything on its way to being sold in the Eu.
Most foreign investors say that they back us remaining with some saying they may have to build new factories in other Eu countries if we leave.
The head of the bank of England is in my view the most qualified man in Britain to talk about financial effects of Brexit. If that's not enough there are many financial and economic bodies from the treasury to the London school of economics saying that leaving would be very costly.
Again you have simply avoided answering questions.
What was the utopia you were referring to? As somebody who intends to vote out I would like to see whatever it is you are stating these
brexit persons are asserting will happen.
Regarding trade agreements. The pro leave camp has mooted doing what is best for the UK, be that in line with Australia, Canada etc, or creating something entirely new. Agreements that operate minus having to absorb millions into society. Capital always finds a way, and the likes of Goldman Sachs and other multinationals will continue to trade and invest if their support of remain does not bear fruit.
The head of the bank of England is in my view the most qualified man in Britain to talk about financial effects ... And a previous now more independent head took a overtly negative different view.
Your earlier quote. Most foreign investors back change as do most economists ... What change?
As for restrictions on products sold to the EU. All the "red tape" such as dimensions and safety regulations will have to be applied to anything on its way to being sold in the Eu ... Yes they are challenges. Challenges that an industrious race and the market would overcome, but in an area such as say cosmetics industry standards would not be abandoned, they are often universal from multinational to continent and onwards - source my other half who jets of around the world flogging smelly stuff.
A polite repeated question. Can you explain what workers rights are at risk if the UK leaves the EU? Maternity rights? Sick pay? What?
You have also expressed an idea that utilities and industries can be nationalised for a greater good. How would you achieve this given the EU is clearly heading towards privatisation of nationalised industries?