We've met Wales a lot more than 16 times...![]()
And they beat us in 1984*
*Im sure I heard this on the radio this morn.
We've met Wales a lot more than 16 times...![]()
****ing called it.
**** you Woy, you ****.
Everyone called it.
He was obviously going to keep it the same. You only wanted the opposite so you could have an excuse to moan about Hodgson. At least give him a chance to **** it up before losing your ****.
We've met Wales a lot more than 16 times...![]()
I was just repeating what Linneker said on BBC
And they beat us in 1984*
*Im sure I heard this on the radio this morn.
He didn't. He said we've met 4 times this century, that's it. **** knows where you got that from..
Well, if he did things which made sense, such as not picking players who've played like ****e, people wouldn't be able to find things to complain about.
You seem to always try to find an excuse to defend Hodgson.
I don't really have to look for excuses. Just look past the insanely over the top hysteria from some on here and perhaps look at the fact we've hardly ever lost a game under him. How on earth can it be considered strange to defend him?
I don't really have to look for excuses. Just look past the insanely over the top hysteria from some on here and perhaps look at the fact we've hardly ever lost a game under him. How on earth can it be considered strange to defend him?
Sterling shouldn't start. Sterling can't start.
But Sterling will start. That is the way of things with the omnishambles of a manager in charge.
it isnt a must win game, but Id argue that it is a game we mustnt lose.
You're right, we have hardly lost a game under him. We've just lost all the games that mattered.
I don't blame him for how poor we looked at Euro 2012 as he was thrown in at the last second, but any manager who did what we did at the 2014 World Cup should not still be in that job.
It's great how having piss easy groups in which even playing averagely (which is what we did) helps make your record look better on paper, eh?