Ex-Manager Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who would you have as our next Manager


  • Total voters
    213
Club historian Duncan Holley has waded in...

I am pretty sure JS's post is pretty spot on at least as far as the club sees it as a couple of things tally exactly to what I have heard. I would also add I am 99% certain that this post originated directly from the club. With Koeman back tomorrow the release of all this info - which adds up pretty much - is perfect timing. Tomorrow or Tuesday will be interesting!
 
  • Like
Reactions: KillerCephalopod
Club historian Duncan Holley has waded in...

I am pretty sure JS's post is pretty spot on at least as far as the club sees it as a couple of things tally exactly to what I have heard. I would also add I am 99% certain that this post originated directly from the club. With Koeman back tomorrow the release of all this info - which adds up pretty much - is perfect timing. Tomorrow or Tuesday will be interesting!
Where's this - I can't find it on Twitter - deleted tweet or me being blind?
 
I'm sort of with Tobes here, it makes a good story and makes us feel better but something doesn't ring true with me. We wouldn't be showing our "5 year plan" and offering him an extension if the board did not want him.
I still believe that the major motivation for Koeman going are the wages and that still makes him a lying, greedy, dishonourable person in my book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peter Saxton
I'm sort of with Tobes here, it makes a good story and makes us feel better but something doesn't ring true with me. We wouldn't be showing our "5 year plan" and offering him an extension if the board did not want him.
I still believe that the major motivation for Koeman going are the wages and that still makes him a lying, greedy, dishonourable person in my book.

It's not saying we didn't want him. It's saying that we didn't want him as much as he gambled we did.

That part rings very true, particularly after the Christmas rumblings (and I'm not talking about Ronald's post-turkey farts).
 
  • Like
Reactions: KillerCephalopod
Yeah, he says that while Koeman was away on his first holiday we made contact with his former agent.

We were in talks with his former agent weeks before that. He also says that his agent refused the approach and that Koeman knew nothing about it. This is also cobblers, Koeman knew exactly what was being proposed.

Koeman sacked his agent before he went to the Caribbean on holiday. He also said that we'd been turned down by Emery by this point. We hadn't, we only went to Emery when Koeman had himself said no - about 10 days before his change of heart. He also says that we used Jansen, we didn't, we were using Mendes in our managerial search. It's full of inaccuracies which is one reason why I took it with a pinch.

If your first statement is correct and I was an Everton supporter, (thank goodness I am not), I would be a bit concerned that you approached his agent without our permission, it is no different than talking to him personally in my book, don't know the legal side of it perhaps some legal eagle can clarify? We may hear more on this, and even get a bit more pocket money out of it? :emoticon-0130-devil:emoticon-0136-giggl
 
I'm sort of with Tobes here, it makes a good story and makes us feel better but something doesn't ring true with me. We wouldn't be showing our "5 year plan" and offering him an extension if the board did not want him.
I still believe that the major motivation for Koeman going are the wages and that still makes him a lying, greedy, dishonourable person in my book.

Have you read the post?

Of course we wanted to keep Koeman, we offered him a new contract.

The point of the post is that Saints were not willing to keep Koeman at all costs. That we didn't think of him as highly as he thought we did and he gives the reasons why we didn't up our contract offer.

The post comes across as negative as it lists the reasons we didn't think he was worth the pay rise
 
Have you read the post?

Of course we wanted to keep Koeman, we offered him a new contract.

The point of the post is that Saints were not willing to keep Koeman at all costs. That we didn't think of him as highly as he thought we did and he gives the reasons why we didn't up our contract offer.

The post comes across as negative as it lists the reasons we didn't think he was worth the pay rise

I already knew that we would never match Everton's offer, that would've been crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KillerCephalopod
If the club is the source (if?), they obviously want Koeman gone. So far they have maintained silence...perhaps hoping to keep him (as said, it would suit us to keep him originally without everything being perfect). This would only be released if they want him gone or (more likely) they know he is going. Personally, I don't think it is a deliberate leak....more a case of you can't keep everyone quiet, especially those tormented by fans rabbitting on without knowing anything. I can accept that Jan doesn't want to go...Saints is a nice place to work and Ronald is the one who gains most...but he will do well by hitching himself to RK's wagon.
 
If your first statement is correct and I was an Everton supporter, (thank goodness I am not), I would be a bit concerned that you approached his agent without our permission, it is no different than talking to him personally in my book, don't know the legal side of it perhaps some legal eagle can clarify? We may hear more on this, and even get a bit more pocket money out of it? :emoticon-0130-devil:emoticon-0136-giggl
It's merely the way it works mate. You don't ask a club for permission to speak to their manager without having already sounded them out. Same goes for players.

I don't think speaking to an agent is against the rules lol
 
Club historian Duncan Holley has waded in...

I am pretty sure JS's post is pretty spot on at least as far as the club sees it as a couple of things tally exactly to what I have heard. I would also add I am 99% certain that this post originated directly from the club. With Koeman back tomorrow the release of all this info - which adds up pretty much - is perfect timing. Tomorrow or Tuesday will be interesting!
If it was club PR it'd have gone via a journalist straight into print, and not via some random on a forum who has no credibility