Lets not open that 'can of worms' againI thought we did have the option to buy with Toby, but we had to make the offer by a specific date, which we missed.

Lets not open that 'can of worms' againI thought we did have the option to buy with Toby, but we had to make the offer by a specific date, which we missed.

Did he? I think I remember hearing the club were content to accept a large fee for someone who wasn't first choice in his position. Or am I remembering that wrong?Chambers made it quite clear that he didn't see his future with Saints when he left why would we now go back and give him a springboard to kickstart his Arsenal career ? For me a loan is an absolute No No. If hes offered to us at a cut price and he wants to come back then that is another story.
STATEMENT: Calum Chambers leaves Southampton - http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/article/28072014-statement-calum-chambers-arsenal-1787887.aspxDid he? I think I remember hearing the club were content to accept a large fee for someone who wasn't first choice in his position. Or am I remembering that wrong?
No way would I let him have the wage he is on now though. I would also write into his contract he has to say sorry for being a cock.If this was a possibility and he wanted it, Arsenal wanted it and we were happy with the price, I wouldn't want us cutting off our nose to spite our face.
No way would I let him have the wage he is on now though. I would also write into his contract he has to say sorry for being a cock.

Nope I said at the time I was told he wanted to go and wouldn't take no for a answer ( or something like that) . Reed then said the same in his article.Did he? I think I remember hearing the club were content to accept a large fee for someone who wasn't first choice in his position. Or am I remembering that wrong?
I would think about £40k-50k. There was a article that said £10k but no way is that true.That last bit made me laugh out loud!!
What's he on?
For me it doesn't really come down to what a 19 year old Chambers thought or said at the time. Whether or not he would improve our team and if we can get him for a good price are the factors that would influence the decision to purchase him.
But there's different costs. He would undoubtedly make our squad better, but would set Cuco (who has vastly improved) back, and then next summer, the Arse get their improved more experienced asset back, probably to sell to West Ham & we are back looking for another space to fill. Again, no thanks. He ditched us against the advice of Ron, so for me this is all hearsay anyway, no truth in it at all. .
No way would I let him have the wage he is on now though. I would also write into his contract he has to say sorry for being a cock.
http://www.thehardtackle.com/news/2...o-end-misery-with-a-move-back-to-southampton/
Suggestion that Chambers might be loaned to Saints so that we get an extra player for the season ahead and Arsenal get a more experienced player back after a season with Saints. Sod that for a game of soldiers!! Have no problem with Chambers coming back permanently if Les and Ron thinks it's a good idea, but do favours for a team that we can now seriously regard as a rival. P*** off. (you can tell I feel strongly about this).
Or an experienced manager to replace Wenger next season?
*RUNS*
How long has Wenger got left on his contract? One more year, is it?
Think so*.
(*Guessing. No idea really).