The Daily Mail and Katie Hopkins weigh in on the debate. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-doesn-t-deserve-prison-Twitter-lynching.html
http://www.theguardian.com/technolo...justice-for-johnson-facebook?CMP=share_btn_tw Oh dear. She wouldn't let it lie.
I thought Hopkins wrote for the Sun not the Daily Heil, not much difference though I suppose really, terrible article
Why would she? She's standing up for her brother. Stuart Hall got 5 years on appeal for abusing a nine year old and a number of others girls over a period of years. Adam Johnson is likely to get a minimum of 5 years for putting his hand down her pants, kissing her and sending some rude tweets.
She should stay out of it for obvious reasons. She wont get many who will run with her. However, imo Adam Johnson should get no more than 2 years served time and 2 years house arrest. Whilst I don't agree with it,, Stuart Hall's age was taken into account as well as what the law said at the time of his offences. But I agree Stuart Hall got off lightly.
Sunderland chief executive Margaret Byrne has resigned with immediate effect in the wake of the Adam Johnson child sex case. Her departure follows criticism of the football club over its handling of the disgraced footballer's case. She said in a statement: "I recognise that, as CEO, my involvement with Mr Johnson and the decision to allow him to continue to represent Sunderland was a serious mistake." http://news.sky.com/story/1655930/sunderland-chief-quits-after-johnson-sex-trial
I wonder if the PL will expunge all of Adam Johnson's appearances thus removing his goals as well ? Not a fecking chance but they should do. imo.
Surely big Sam has some questions to answer now, he obviously made no effort to look into the situation himself otherwise he would have discovered what was going on, instead he just stuck the player back into the squad as soon as his suspension was lifted.
I was a bit surprised that they let him start playing again because it doesn't mean he's innocent just because he intimated he was going to plead not guilty. I doubt the chief executive came to the decision herself. Either it was Ellis Short or the whole board who decided. Sunderland have tried to heap all the blame on her and hope the complaints stop.
I can only assume some of you lot do not have daughters or sisters. Just because Hall got off lightly doesn't mean this **** should too.
