Airco Injunction

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You want to see minutes of a conversation that never happened? Erm......

All board meeting minutes are available on the Trust website.
OLM, or someone, said there had been a meeting today between the Trust and Brady or Geraghty...I think...

It's possible I've been whooshed but that was the impression I got.

If there was no meeting between the Trust and any HCC members today, my bad, if there was, will we see any minutes from that meeting?

Meh I was just being amusing in my reply to Lambo earlier.
 
HCC - 'While the SMC incurred £67k costs, the council’s costs were not of this magnitude and the total cost is below the figure indicated as the majority of resource applied was from staff employed by the council''

Tit-for-tat nonsense, that's why the SMC statement was stupid.
Even if there's not so many extra payments made there's still a cost. If I spend my time doing anything not for clients it's reducing the money I could have earned from client work. Similarly with the council, they have to spend extra money on wages doing the work they could have been doing which they chose to spend working on the court case.

It's a crazy situation all round. The Airco could have had greater use locally and I can't imagine the Academy making much use of it given it's location.
 
Even if there's not so many extra payments made there's still a cost. If I spend my time doing anything not for clients it's reducing the money I could have earned from client work. Similarly with the council, they have to spend extra money on wages doing the work they could have been doing which they chose to spend working on the court case.

It's a crazy situation all round. The Airco could have had greater use locally and I can't imagine the Academy making much use of it given it's location.

The academy have only used it three times, it was about ticking boxes, rather than a facility the club has any use for at this time of year, though obviously it will get more use in winter.
 
OLM, or someone, said there had been a meeting today between the Trust and Brady or Geraghty...I think...

It's possible I've been whooshed but that was the impression I got.

If there was no meeting between the Trust and any HCC members today, my bad, if there was, will we see any minutes from that meeting?

Meh I was just being amusing in my reply to Lambo earlier.
I got the wrong end of the stick, soz.
 
Is it? Are you sure?

I see the Trust used some of my subscription to give to the Allam owned Hull City Tigers Limited.

Yes.

The Trust used it's subscription money to promote itself within the ground to grow it's membership and to show it's willingness to work with the club for be benefit of both parties.
 
Interesting read. The Academy will stop using the Airco in September 2016. A pitch will be built elsewhere....

They should have done that anyway. The club failed to meet the original criteria for Cat 2, requested an earlier re-assessment even though they weren't ready. No one's fault but their own. The citizens of Hull should not have lost an asset to private hands. It's disgraceful.
 
They should have done that anyway. The club failed to meet the original criteria for Cat 2, requested an earlier re-assessment even though they weren't ready. No one's fault but their own. The citizens of Hull should not have lost an asset to private hands. It's disgraceful.

I was against the Airco evictions from the off and still am, but doesn't the court ruling mean we haven't lost an asset, but had its potential use changed?
 
angus young ‏@angus_young61
HCC legal chief Ian Anderson says appeal against Airco judgement is unlikely.

angus young ‏@angus_young61
HCC legal chief Ian Anderson says loss of Airco Arena's previous facilities is a big blow to womens sport in Hull.

angus young ‏@angus_young61
HCC legal chief Ian Anderson on relations with Allams/SMC: 'Its a situation that has not completely broken down. Its not going to be easy but we are where we are. Hopefully we can move on and continue our engagement.'
 
Last edited:
Everyone involved should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. No ifs, no buts, no maybes.
 
My original post answers your question

Was there a previous post, to save me trawling through, or was that the original? If it was the original I am surprised you endorse his actions as you criticised him for what he was doing when this first started.
 
In the circumstances I would in this instance done exactly what the Allams have done.

Would you ****. People are always retrospectively trying to justify Allam's crazy Ideas but no one ever said it'd be a good idea to take over a public facility by force and without paying for it. Just like no one ever said Hull City wasn't a good enough name until Allam came up with the idea of changing it. And no one said the ASI fund shouldn't be spent on fans, but obviously once Allam decides its not happening after lying about it for months his followers all pretend it's exactly what they wanted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: renegadetiger