There were reports that we were looking at him at some point this summer, but were put off by his injury record I think. Or something like that.Alex Song: West Ham agree deal to sign Barcelona midfielder
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/33996711
I doubt he would have been suitable for us, as he plays as a defensive midfielder.
Take it from an Arsenal fan. Alex Song is most definitely not a 'defensive' midfielder. He marauds forward and has no positional discipline at all. Erratic passer of the ball and clumsy tackler.
Why Barcelona even wanted him in the first place was beyond me. It was clear as day that he wasn't anywhere close to the level of the players there.
I think he's a great passer of the ball but as you say, he's totally lacking discipline. His sending off at the World Cup was an insult to his team and all the Cameroonian fans, he wasn't even angry, he just did it for the Hell of it.
He could end up being a success at West Ham and he does have the qualities to be a good Prem player, but I'm yet to be convinced.You guys don't understand what diving is. Young had to throw himself out of the way, otherwise he would've made contact with Dier.
Contact. On a football pitch. Legs could've been bruised, people! Fergie made it clear how delicate United players are, anything other than landing on soft grass could've resulted in amputated limbs or death. He had no choice.
Same with Rooney against Preston last season, if it weren't for his quick thinking he'd be in a wheelchair.
Take it from an Arsenal fan. Alex Song is most definitely not a 'defensive' midfielder. He marauds forward and has no positional discipline at all. Erratic passer of the ball and clumsy tackler.
Why Barcelona even wanted him in the first place was beyond me. It was clear as day that he wasn't anywhere close to the level of the players there.
Fair enough! Although I did see him put in some impressive performances with the spammers when acting as a defensive midfielder, unless he suffers from the same condition as Adebayor, in that you can never really be confident with what you're getting from him as a footballer.
He dived against us on the opening day. Dier got booked and absolutely slaughtered him for it.
You must log in or register to see mediaHe may have stood on a landmine though, in which case I apologise.
), yet some of these primadonnas feel it necessary to look like they've been shot. If a guy comes in two footed then absolutely jump out the way but Dier would've just tripped him, diving like he did - in the opposite direction! - was absolutely pathetic.Bale dived. Bale still dives. Bale got a serious of ridiculous decisions, both for and against, that were clearly, obviously wrong.Most footballers will look to gain any advantage they can on the pitch and I remember our fans defending Bale (who I guess was a saint and never dived) Young does look dramatic, but then he will say hes protecting himself, much like our fans used to say for Bale.
Bale dived. Bale still dives. Bale got a serious of ridiculous decisions, both for and against, that were clearly, obviously wrong.
Young seems to get the benefit of the doubt, despite being a well-known, constant diver, playing in a team of similar divers.
Rooney gets similar treatment for his various indiscretions, just as Scholes did for his horrendous tackles.
There's some kind of theme there, but I can't put my finger on it...
The difference with Bale is that the media started one of their occasional crusades against diving and picked Bale as the focal point even though he has never been by far the worst culprit, and indeed was getting some ludicrous decisions given against him. I remember during a radio commentary the Radio 5 commentator took time out of the commentary to talk about how Bale should change his ways and Spurs weren't even playing in that match! Yet whenever the media types do get back to this subject - cheating - not that they ever call it for what it is - they completely fail to ridicule the most serious and serial offenders. Has this latest Young dive been mentioned anywhere? Let's not forget it got them a free kick in a very dangerous position.
The difference is a club level. Utd, for example, continue to play their divers (Young, Rooney, etc) as did Liverpool with Slippy.
Spurs took the moral high ground and shipped Bale out.
This is what makes no sense to me: there's been numerous players in Premier League history with very public reputations for diving (i.e. Rooney, Gerrard, Suarez, Drogba, Torres, Owen, Young...I'm going to be here all day aren't I?) yet officials seem to be unaware of this - yet when Rodgers makes some comment about Bale diving, even though he was clearly fouled in the incident Rodgers was blathering on about, he gained a "reputation" as was penalised whether he was fouled or whether he dived.Bale dived. Bale still dives. Bale got a serious of ridiculous decisions, both for and against, that were clearly, obviously wrong.
Young seems to get the benefit of the doubt, despite being a well-known, constant diver, playing in a team of similar divers.
Rooney gets similar treatment for his various indiscretions, just as Scholes did for his horrendous tackles.
There's some kind of theme there, but I can't put my finger on it...