City transfer thread

Kinell.

Just get rid of both.

(By that I mean BV and KB, not Thudd and Jela)

 

Is he coming to be going?

 

If we earmarked a £9m spend we'd also "earmark" a massive rise in revenue.

 

Be ****ed off if Diame and Thudd go. I don't think we will get decent enough replacements.

 

I assumed that was a joke.

 

Us highjacking any deal sounds quite funny giving how we seem to mess about.

 

If it was there wasn't much comedy value.

 

I think losing Huddlestone would be bad. He's looked much fitter and this league should be a piece of piss for him.

 

He certainly looks trim and up for it.

Which isn't helping the with the number of bidders...

 

It would be nice to think if we sell Hudd & Diame we could potentially end up with a better midfield.. if Bruce brings in the best possible replacements... like a Lansbury or Jota partnership... but we'll probably end up with palacious and meyler...

 

Certainly don't want to be left with Meyler.

 

Don't ideally want to start with him either

 

Sorry, mate, but that's just bloody nonsense.

 

The concern isn't losing Thudd, it's replacing him with ****ing Palacios.

 

If an offer has been made, there's no way Huddlestone will be staying.

**** - Just when we looked like we were keeping hold of the players we wanted to keep.

 

Happy days, if it happens.

 

Unless you can guarantee we have better replacements coming in, why would it be happy days?

 

Not very happy at all

 

If I had any say in a release clause at a club for a player I would want to write in the release clause expires early in each transfer window. It's madness that a player can announce he's leaving in the last day of the window.