Moses is probably speaking to Gray, so he'll have the inside track on whether or not Gray wants to come. Which is why the chase continues.
Have to wait and seeMoses is probably speaking to Gray, so he'll have the inside track on whether or not Gray wants to come. Which is why the chase continues.
Why would he have go back if they have sorted the medical and paperwork brentford waivered the 21 daysWe are all just speculating. If the deal was off there chairman would be all over twitter crowing about it.
The lad may have been called back but his medical and paperwork are sorted, its now just a case of him waiting for brentford to release him. if anything it will strengthen his resolve to join us.
Why would he have go back if they have sorted the medical and paperwork brentford waivered the 21 days
He works for the Ealing Gazette.
Didnt know he was staying there thanks for the infoMaybe he couldn't be arsed to stay in the Hallmark Hotel any longer!
Didnt know he was staying there thanks for the info

Made some good films at the Studios there - mostly farces (comedies) and fantasy ("Alice in Wonderland"). Hope it doesn't rub off on the Gazette![]()
Lol mate id imagine he be back in london by now if deal is off the local press in hull not said out so could be all pure speculationI don't know if he's staying there - was having a slight giggle
Orrin Schwarz @Orrin_Schwarz 1h1 hour ago
Club source confirms [HASHTAG]#cf97[/HASHTAG] has rejected Hull City offer for Shaun Maloney. Fire does not want to move him now.
Why would he have go back if they have sorted the medical and paperwork brentford waivered the 21 days
I'm not seeing anything here in the U.S. saying the bid has been rejected. Also I'm not seeing any tweets from Chicago papers or ESPN just some bloggers from Chicago with tiny amounts of followers.Lol mate id imagine he be back in london by now if deal is off the local press in hull not said out so could be all pure speculation
That would be a stupid thing to do elle - the Allams have had enough bad press with their idiotic tactics. If such a scheme ever got out, no club would ever deal with them again. I go so far as to suggest it'd be viewed as fraudulent business practise.
I don't think this is likely at all, the sell-on is nothing to do with us and they couldn't realistically fiddle enough to make a significant difference.
I highly doubt it would be us who are insisting on the double deal, it will definitely be Brentford so they can fiddle it so that they don't have to pay as much to Luton.
Why would a double deal benefit us or even mean anything to us? It wouldn't, it has to be Brentford..
I'm not seeing anything here in the U.S. saying the bid has been rejected. Also I'm not seeing any tweets from Chicago papers or ESPN just some bloggers from Chicago with tiny amounts of followers.
Yea I hear that but let's not over blow these "cup" games. It's not like your cup games, no one is going to attend, and no one is going to watch. They really mean nothing and no one cares about them.In an interview on Rh a Chicago sports reporter suggested that with an important match in a few days time and a possible final at the end of September that the bid may be resisted at this moment.
Yea I hear that but let's not over blow these "cup" games. It's not like your cup games, no one is going to attend, and no one is going to watch. They really mean nothing and no one cares about them.
It's like saying we wouldn't sell a player because we have a friendly coming up.