Nah I rang Abdul at Shampaan. Poppy Doms & ****, Stuffed Pepper, Special Biriyani with a Madras sauce & a couple of pints of diet coke. All good.
2015/16 Matchday Prices Confirmed
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Nah I rang Abdul at Shampaan. Poppy Doms & ****, Stuffed Pepper, Special Biriyani with a Madras sauce & a couple of pints of diet coke. All good.
Ehab did explain it. He said that the prices reflect their ambition and that's all he can say.
The absolute ****.
They stick prices up a further 10% after relegation and after a hike the year prior, and he has the cheek to flatly refuse to explain it.
Oh that's alright then. Yes we are priced accordingly.
I reckon the face slap's about the most apt thing in your reply.
Where did I say it was okay? I was simply trying to see why OLM's claim differs so much from the sky article in case I was reading one or both wrong.
£100 less would still be on the expensive side I think, but I'd pay it. Immediately.
Now that the Hull Tigers thing has (albeit perhaps temporarily) ended, that is now the only thing that would hold me back.
I've blown my money on a holiday already, but I would find a way to pay it, in full, somehow.
I'm not paying best part of £30, or over in some cases, on individual games.
Now that the Hull Tigers thing has (albeit perhaps temporarily) ended, that is now the only thing that would hold me back.
I've blown my money on a holiday already, but I would find a way to pay it, in full, somehow.
I'm not paying best part of £30, or over in some cases, on individual games.
So you agree I didn't say it was okay. <OK>
I guess you could argue it differs by one if everywhere else in the world has cheaper cheapest tickets. I find it unlikely, but would like to see where the claim came from.
It's a bit of a meaningless claim anyway as it excludes so much else, such as availability and other fees.
So it's not okay then? Why don't you comment more on that, rather than constantly trying to find holes in everything derogatory anyone ever has to say about the ****ty way the Allams are running our club?
Do you know where the figures came from?
Perhaps if you considered and questioned the claims rather than getting defensive and querying people asking for more detail on claims made, you could have a more accurate picture. They're not always accurate.
I'm not getting defensive and I really don't see where you've got that from? Surely those figures are accurate enough for anyone. We are playing Brentford this season?
Edit: No offence meant to Brentford.
Looks pretty defensive to me, particularly when considered with your other replies to me and associated wrong assumptions, but that's by the by.
I guess you couldn't find where the figures from either, so as you're clearly unable to help, it's probably best to just wait for olm's reply.
£16 was far too much for that Game. Should be a freebie against Burnley
Perhaps it's all in the context, and the actual words written shouldn't be taken literally.
I'm guessing you don't know where the figures came from either.
Perhaps when in context t,they can be taken literally,rather than trying to make things say what they didn't.
It seems some people get nervous if someone queries claims made about querying claims made.
I'm not even saying it's wrong or made up, I'm simply trying to understand the claim.
That list has Everton's starting at £544, but that's a mistake, their adult passes actually start at £444, putting us 10th.
http://www.evertonfc.com/news/2015/02/09/season-ticket-price-freeze-for-201516
I'm not bothered whether the figures are right or not. You're the one who originally said a post should be looked at in context, and that even though you wrote a specific sentence you claimed you didn't. You really do argue just for the sake of it.I'm guessing you don't know where the figures came from either.
Perhaps when in context t,they can be taken literally,rather than trying to make things say what they didn't.
It seems some people get nervous if someone queries claims made about querying claims made.
I'm not even saying it's wrong or made up, I'm simply trying to understand the claim.