If you never made those assertions, you'd best find out who has your log in details.
Good luck in court.
Edit. I guess you're meaning running over people, that's the conclusion drawn from your argument. If it's the pedestrians fault, the driver is innocent if he runs someone over on a crossing if the light is green. The law says otherwise, and starts from the driver being guilty, and needs to show why he isn't.
Where did I make any assertions about it being acceptable to run over people? Unlike you I am advocating pedestrians follow the regulations and only cross at a designated place when the light is on green. You are asserting they can do what they want and any resulting accidents are the fault of any vehicle drivers who may come into contact with them. If pedestrians can cross where and when they want and ignoring the little red man on crossings why do we waste money having them?

