newspaper article agreeing with the name change

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Ha. I just thought the way you wrote it was funny.

Like you were quoting a scholar.

Thanks for your memories of yourself.

Without this turning into a bitch fight, I read the article and it reminded me of my first posts on the subject. Since then I have changed my view.

I posted my thoughts on the article. I know what you mean and will take your critic on board. Thank you kind Sir.
 
Without this turning into a bitch fight, I read the article and it reminded me of my first posts on the subject. Since then I have changed my view.

I posted my thoughts on the article. I know what you mean and will take your critic on board. Thank you kind Sir.

You're welcome.
 
Every national newspaper article(other then David Conn) I've read has failed to mention it has nothing to with making money and all about his disagreement with HCC
 
He's welcome to his views, the point of journalism is presenting both sides (or more) of an argument. He's probably playing Devil's Advocate professionally and doesn't really support name changes personally.
 
Decided he was spouting bullshit when he brought Rugby into it. Different sport mate.

AND began saying how long some of the 'ancient' names were but then said Wakefield Trinity Wildcates, which is much larger than Tottenham Hotspur.

Third flaw, He says nobody would refer to their full names, says about West Bromich Albion, Tottenham Hotspur, Brighton and Hove Albion etc. Tottenham get called Spurs, West Brom either West Brom or the Albion etc. What a muppet.
 
daily mail writers don't have integrity. their job is to stir and provoke hatred.
 
I don't get how nobody in the media is picking up the dispute with the council.

(The club not the council) should have raised eyebrows at the very least. It's a key element to the story that's being widely ignored.
 
I don't get how nobody in the media is picking up the dispute with the council.

(The club not the council) should have raised eyebrows at the very least. It's a key element to the story that's being widely ignored.


Yep, he repeated it twice, very sarcastic, clearly a very bitter man. What really pisses me off is that he is using the fans to vent his spleen against others. He's a **** and not crazy or past it, just a **** of a man who donates to build his status. He wants to be the head man, instead he's just a headcase. The sooner we're shot of him the better.
 
Some say we're mad, some say we're insane, but we're only perverted and pissed out of our brains,

and it's Hull City, Hull City FC

We're by far the greatest team, the world has ever seen.


CITY ULL, CITY ULL, CITY 'ULL.

If you're meaning Hull City AFC, our official name is effectively both.

That's not our name either.