The problem with Lovren's statements is that it's blatantly obvious he's lying.
He wanted to play at LFC as soon as we played them, and yet he would have turned down a move to Liverpool had they made it earlier this summer. He is upset that the board did not tell him about a transfer offer, yet by the time that transfer offer was made he already had made up his mind to go, so what difference would it have made? He feels that the board isn't showing ambition, but he never gave them a chance to show ambition at all.
I can't take any of what he says at face value. Those who think the board is to blame, or the exit of NC or whatever, will continue to do so. Those who think it's the big money will also continue to do so.
Something happened prior to the summer, I think. That something was more than just NC leaving, or the "death of a dream." But what that something was, I don't know.
Had the board opened up new contract negotiations with Lallana, Lovren, and yes perhaps even Shaw and Lambert prior to the end of the season, might they have signed them and still be here? Could the board have afforded those wages?
No, Shaw was going way before the end of the season. Everything was basically agreed.
