Suarez at it again

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I've heard Suarez is going to spend his 4 months in New Guinea in quiet contemplation, where he can also eat his favourite meal.
 
I have been wondering if the Suarez biting thing has been taken out of proportion. He obviously has a problem as biting is an age appropriate repsonse. When you're his age and still doing it when he sees the red mist is out of the ordinary but is it really that much worse to warrant the sanctions imposed on him? Why is it so much worse than say a footballer punching someone in the head/headbutting someone/stamping hard with studs or a reckless tackle to cause a break in a players leg during a game? The would result in 3/4 match bans and wouldn't carry over from international to domestic matches and vice versa? Is it because biting can cause infections? Suarez clearly needs some professional help to deal with his problem so that he won't do it again. I would have thought that FIFA would have also put a clause in place in his ban that he seeks/gets help.
 
originallambrettaman said:
Luis Suarez has left Brazil and returned to Uruguay after being banned from all football for four months, with his lawyer insisting he will take the case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport if necessary...

http://news.sky.com/story/1290582/disgraced-suarez-returns-home-to-uruguay
Click to expand...


Dear Mr Suarez,

I suppose all of this is like a kick in the teeth for you. Now you know what it feels like for the players you have bitten.

Stop acting like a 2 year old, stay at home and serve your ban. Also, please get a transfer out of England because I don't want to see your f*****g ugly rat face again.

Kind regards
Over18 and legal
 
Charlie1 said:
I have been wondering if the Suarez biting thing has been taken out of proportion. He obviously has a problem as biting is an age appropriate repsonse. When you're his age and still doing it when he sees the red mist is out of the ordinary but is it really that much worse to warrant the sanctions imposed on him? Why is it so much worse than say a footballer punching someone in the head/headbutting someone/stamping hard with studs or a reckless tackle to cause a break in a players leg during a game? The would result in 3/4 match bans and wouldn't carry over from international to domestic matches and vice versa? Is it because biting can cause infections? Suarez clearly needs some professional help to deal with his problem so that he won't do it again. I would have thought that FIFA would have also put a clause in place in his ban that he seeks/gets help.
Click to expand...

I heard on the radio earlier today that he has had professional help this season. Fat lot of good that did
 
Cityswall said:
I disagree biting is the lowest of the low and this is the 3rd time he has done it.
Also if you take into account that he will have no football to play for a month then it is actually only 3 months in real terms.
Click to expand...

It's certainly down there with spitting.
 
Charlie1 said:
Why? Surely there are worse injuries caused that haven't had as long a ban.
Click to expand...

Doesn't that depend on how long he lives?

If he'd bitten Billy Whitehurst, I reckon it'd have been a short ban if it was a lifetimes. <laugh>
 
Chiellini jist released this statement

&#8220;Now inside me there's no feelings of joy, revenge or anger against Suarez for an incident that happened on the pitch and that's done. There only remain the anger and the disappointment about the match. At the moment my only thought is for Luis and his family, because they will face a very difficult period. I have always considered unequivocal the disciplinary interventions by the competent bodies, but at the same time I believe that the proposed formula is excessive. I sincerely hope that he will be allowed, at least, to stay close to his team mates during the games because such a ban is really alienating for a player.&#8221;
 
Patches O'Houlihan said:
An injury caused by a professional foul is a lot different to biting an opponent, three times.
Click to expand...

Professional foul? Define one please. I seem to remember Guthrie chasing ***an up and down the touchline till he broke his leg on the 2nd/3rd attempt. Did he get 3 match ban? Was that a professional foul?
 
Charlie1 said:
Professional foul? Define one please. I seem to remember Guthrie chasing ***an up and down the touchline till he broke his leg on the 2nd/3rd attempt. Did he get 3 match ban? Was that a professional foul?
Click to expand...

It's a contact sport, bones will be broken. Biting on the other hand is disgusting and unnecessary in football. Guthrie's challenge on ***an would be classed as serious foul play and deserving of a red card, he got a red card and was suspended.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back