Ehab Allam said:This is a more stripped back and modern approach
Are we the only prem club that doesnt have our name on the badge now.
thankfully , typing 1904 into google brings up Hull City's Wikipedia page second on the list !
And you show the old badge to someone in the rest of the world who can't speak/ read English and they'd know who we were?
Why are we discussing whether it's a nice badge or not? It doesn't matter at all what it looks like, all that matters is that Allam has once again thrown a paddy, stamped his feet at not getting his own way over the FA decision and made damn sure that he won't be seen to not get his own way, so he's changed something else. Because he can't change the name he's just trying to remove it completely.
Instead of looking at marketing the club, or all the other stuff that needs doing, our club has been busy behind the scenes working on a new badge for no other reason than to massage the owner's bruised ego. It's all about him and his power, that's far more important than the club's success financially or on the pitch, to our owner at least. The design of the badge means nothing to me, it could be the most beautiful design ever, but instead of representing Hull City, this badge represents Allam and his hatred for the name Hull City AFC.
It doesn't bring up anything Hull City related when I Google "1904".
Why are we discussing whether it's a nice badge or not? It doesn't matter at all what it looks like, all that matters is that Allam has once again thrown a paddy, stamped his feet at not getting his own way over the FA decision and made damn sure that he won't be seen to not get his own way, so he's changed something else. Because he can't change the name he's just trying to remove it completely.
Instead of looking at marketing the club, or all the other stuff that needs doing, our club has been busy behind the scenes working on a new badge for no other reason than to massage the owner's bruised ego. It's all about him and his power, that's far more important than the club's success financially or on the pitch, to our owner at least. The design of the badge means nothing to me, it could be the most beautiful design ever, but instead of representing Hull City, this badge represents Allam and his hatred for the name Hull City AFC.
As per PLT's signature, didn't he just say he wouldn't change the logo? Isn't the logo just the tiger's head bit and not the text around the edge?
Haha, I like it! Why don't they just change the name to Allam FC and have a great big fist grasping for cash as the badge... the ****ers! First England then this, **** meFirst he took away our AFC then he took our city away now he has took the ****ing lot and left us with 1904.
1904 too long? Too common you mean?Thats next to go its too long
Probably, Norwich and Wolves don't have their name on their badges, but obviously they're not Premier League.
On the press release announcing the new badge, there is not one single reference to Hull City, we now refer to ourselves as 'The Club'. Pathetic.
Spurs and Liverpool don't.