Can you read?, he never played in the 1st 5 games of the season and we were top of the league in his absence, I never said we were a great team I said that the rest of the players scoring 35 goals in just over half a season was pretty great.
We have done far better without Suarez due to his ban than Spurs did without Bale during the same time, we are definitely a better outfit than you're prepared to admit.![]()

Liverpool are only 6 points ahead of Utd. By all accounts, Utd are woeful and would be lucky to gain re-election to the football league if we still had it. So, by comparison, how good would a Suarez-less Liverpool be?![]()

So, the 23 goals that Suarez has scored in 18 PL games has absolutely no bearing on your current league position then?? ...


I never said that.
You were talking about us being poor without Suarez and I was just pointing out how wrong you were.![]()
Liverpool are only 6 points ahead of Utd. By all accounts, Utd are woeful and would be lucky to gain re-election to the football league if we still had it. So, by comparison, how good would a Suarez-less Liverpool be?![]()

You intimated it!...with, or without Suarez, you have a good-ish side. Obviously, far better with. But great, no way!..
If Goofy were to leave tomorrow, no way would 'Pool finish higher than 7th, at best.

Who said we were great?
I never.
I think most honest Mousers would readily agree and admit that 'Pool is punching well above its weight, this season.

Liverpool are only 6 points ahead of Utd. By all accounts, Utd are woeful and would be lucky to gain re-election to the football league if we still had it. So, by comparison, how good would a Suarez-less Liverpool be?![]()
Hoddle Is A God:6001065 said:I think most honest Mousers would readily agree and admit that 'Pool is punching well above its weight, this season.
If Goofy were to leave tomorrow, no way would 'Pool finish higher than 7th, at best.


bow4fowler ☆;6001214 said:A truly shocking Spurs dive there.