... And anybody can see that the pass it back, pass it sideways, pass it back, go 1 step forward, pass it sideways, pass it back tactic, clearly didn't work either. No one wants to see hoofball. A parent also doesn't want their child associated with a failing team in the bottom tier of the English game.
It's about getting a right blend of everything. Clever one touch, pass and move football when it is called for, direct hustle and bustle, physical football when it's necessary with the right players to play it. SOD's failure was to recognise his brand of football wasn't working, and then failed to put the appropriate players in place when the ball was sent long.
I genuinely don't believe things can be worse, and although SC doesn't excite me, I'd take him over SOD any day of the week.
City did not pass it back pass it back all the time. The "intent" was not too. The "intent" would have taken years to implement. There has to be a slavish drive away from direct hustle and bustle football, Its dead, it holds clubs back. Its naive to think you will have an XI doing all those things you desire in months v years.
My son is being trained by Bristol City. Any parent wants to see their child at a club with a clear direction. I thought BCFC had one.
Now City again could be changing path and that can have long term consequences.

