Match Thoughts/Report/Ramblings - QPR 0 Brighton 0

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Woodyhoopleson said:
What was O'neil's role yesterday? Middle of 3 behind Austin, am I right?
Click to expand...

It was but he offered absolutely zero in that position which is Carrolls position. He didnt do well at all and was surprised he stayed on the whole game.
I can think of 2 things SWP did well, tracked back for a great tackle and a nice long cross field ball but I cannot think of anything positive that ONeill did considering his only job was to create chances.

Its a must Carroll or hopefully Kranjcar start there every game.
 
From my point of view, at the moment I'm glad we look such a solid unit. Such a difference from last season, maybe we all forget how far the team has come in such a short space of time.
Austin will fire eventually, patience is required by ourselves, interesting to read in that John Byrne interview how long it took him to get his debut goal.
 
rangercol said:
Exactly right. People are saying that the back four looked comfortable............that's because of the protection afforded them by Henry!
Click to expand...

It's a circular argument -Brighton's back four were equally as comfortable because we played Henry. Terribly negative from Redknapp and deserving of a 0-0 scoreline.
 
Stroller said:
It's a circular argument -Brighton's back four were equally as comfortable because we played Henry. Terribly negative from Redknapp and deserving of a 0-0 scoreline.
Click to expand...

To continue the circular argument, playing Henry allows the FB's to move forward more so aiding the attacking play. It is mostly a creative midfielder that we need so getting Krankjar fit & Carroll experience are vital.
 
BlindFaith said:
To continue the circular argument, playing Henry allows the FB's to move forward more so aiding the attacking play.
Click to expand...

Was trying to stay out of this now as its gone on long enough but I cant have that.

Sums up how risk averse, boring and negative some are on this board. It just plainly isn’t true!!

One full back can go forward at a time and overlap when we’re attacking. That could have happened with or without Henry
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back