Premature celebrations again,
I thought you lot would have learned your lessons about this sort of thing by now![]()
They'll never learn

Premature celebrations again,
I thought you lot would have learned your lessons about this sort of thing by now![]()

Premature celebrations again,
I thought you lot would have learned your lessons about this sort of thing by now![]()
Who was celebrating? I was just wondering why you were all over here when your team was playing. I'm not on your board.

Game was over mate![]()

When they were over here, the team were playing![]()
6:58 PM
Game started 4:40 PM. Add 92 and 15 minutes and you get 6:47 Pm game ending (approx.)
Piskie's post at 6.58 pm quotes my post which say "explains why the arsenal fans are all over here", which was at 5.11 pm.
WY, vote "HIAG for mod" and I promise you that you won't have to put up with that prattling fool on this board ever again.
But the point you're highlighting is that Brunt's stats are good in an average team, and Xavi's average in a good team.
You could apply the same framework to Bale and Walcott, and it makes Walcott look like the better player because he's playing in a better team.
Sometimes I think you've never watched a football match!
It's completely obvious that any player, good or bad, will tend to have better stats in a better team.
Disagree. In a more balanced team stats will be more evenly spread.
Ozil has much better stats Iniesta, despite the fact Iniesta played in an arguably better team.
Do a thought experiment DL
Imagine Bale in a Championship level team playing in the PL. He would get double and triple marked, the others wouldn't get him the ball much and wouldn't score if he gave it to them. So he'd get few goals or assists. Now imagine him playing for a team as good as Spain in the PL. The team would get loads of goals and Bale would get his fair share of goals and assists too as they couldn't afford to double mark. So the better the team the better stats for everyone. Stats by themselves are meaningless of course as PnP has demonstrated as they are both short-term and too broadbrush.
Sometimes I think you've never watched a football match!
It's completely obvious that any player, good or bad, will tend to have better stats in a better team.

Talkspot commentator about the game Arsenal just lost to Galatassaray:-
"Arsenal 8 year drought continues....they can't even win their own trophy"
![]()

PNP was arguing that Xavi had worse stats that Chris Brunt though, so which one is it ?
The point is you can only really measure like for like, because Chris Brunt's stats would be far worse in a Barcelona side and Xavi's off the scale in a West Brom side. So they don't really give an indication player, only the environment he's in.
We've heard endlessly about how Spurs are supposedly on a level with Arsenal now, so you can argue that Bale and Walcott can be measured using a similar environment, they also play in a similar position - and their stats indicate that they are roughly on a par with each other.
I reluctantly accepted an invitation to the Emirates Cup today from 2 gooner friends. Really enjoyed getting involved with the Galatasaray chants and watching ex-goon Eboue lift the cup for Galatasaray at the end![]()