The destiny of BBC 606 members My guess is that the semi-professional who founded Clip the Apex will have his henchmen hoovering up as many BBC606 members as possible. For any who wondered about my relationship with this site, which is not directly relevant to this thread, the dirty washing is between the lines.
For anyone else, please skip straight to the asterisk at the bottom of this comment!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A personal experience:
For a few weeks, I contributed to the site mentioned above but was taken aback by the moderation team who, I was subsequently told, were apparently in the process of implementing an automatic swear-filter which needed regular updates, but showed a lack of tolerance to some of the 'errors' committed during this period of transition. This so-called swear-filter took objection to my "Red Bull****" (literally as written here with asterisks) at about the time of Christian Horner's denial of team orders. Only days later a member of the moderation team was writing other such words in full. So, in order to avoid any embarrassment for what appeared to be a minor oversight, I sought clarification of this via the Private Message facility. However, it seems some are less respectfulââ¬Â¦
ââ¬Â¦A leading member of that site was also an ordinary member of Muzz606 at the time: a site which I took considerable interest in. He and at least one of his minions (presumably recruited for the task, who appeared, made vicious comments and vanished, without the courage to use his/her familiar name from the other site) seemed to sense an imminent collapse of Muzz606 and appeared to attempt what I can only describe as opportunistic pirating of its membership. This attempted coup was done in a most dishonourable fashion in my opinion; deliberately discrediting a leading member of the site; clearly designed to inflame and to sew discontent amongst the members and administration of Muzz's site; together with the blatant canvassing of anyone seeking a higher quality, 'professionally' run forum. (If their founder is to be believed, their site costs money).
On a more positive note, apart from its administration (which, if it still exists, I presume has overcome the unfortunate clash which led me to conclude that it was somewhat up its own back-side), 'Kiss the Ape who runs it' had some high quality members, two of whom undertook the mammoth task of collecting and collating statistical information for analysis - neither of whom felt it their place to become involved in the unsavoury affair described above and both of whom have my utmost respect.
As I'm sure many will know, I go out of my way to avoid personalising disagreements. Even here I have avoided naming these individuals, in spite of this not being reciprocated; neither at the time did I seek to discredit their apparent hypocrisy. It was they who went to another site to make personalised, public remarks naming me - which I feel justifies this statement as a warning to not606. I should add that one of the moderation team did offer what seemed to be a mild apology, but this was before the personalised attack which I believe came from two others.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
*N.B. Views expressed here are mine alone and are not fictitious. My personal clash is in itself not a reason to avoid the site, which, if its administration and one of its moderators have overcome such teething problems and become genuinely 'moderate', I would now expect to be quite good.
For these reasons I would expect the above site to be the most likely beneficiary of the demise of BBC606, particularly since when I parted company it had two excellent and enthusiastic leading members (whom I refer to in the penultimate paragraph between the lines).