Summer Transfer Rumour Thread.

Well Bale has improved, as since he has left us he has been terrorising defences in the PL.

Would he come back and play worse than he did in the Championship at LB? I doubt it.

I'd take Bale and Walcott if offered. It's a non-sensical argument.

 

It's just in these time where money is inflated and loyalty doesn't mean mcuh players anymore, Puncheon is an example of this.

He throw his toys out the pram when AP got sacked and lost respect of everyone.

NC and NA let him back in, funnily enough after we had got promoted and we were top of the Championship
But fair play he has knuckled down and has had a good pre-season.

Shearer or Le Tissier were different. They were incredibly talented players and were more concerned with playing and loyalty. I would gladly welcome them into any role at the club.

They are professionals and role models and that makes me incredible proud.

 

No doubt he has.

Just a case of differing opinions.

Some will agree, some won't.

Good topic really

 

Shearer and Le Tissier are from our past and should not be allowed to return.

 

[/QUOTE]

Shearer and Le Tissier are from our past and should not be allowed to return.[/QUOTE]

Again, your opinion.

 

Errrr, no. Your opinion. I applied it to this point.


See here:

 

Also how have you inferred that Shearer was more concerned with playing and loyalty at Saints?

Do you know him or people who did?

Shearer left, and Le Tissier didn't.

I'm struggling to understand how you came to that conclusion.

 

Hmm I didn't mention them playing again.

I said club role.

Shearer was a leader and did great wherever he played. He has inspired many people. I respect his opinions and he is a very honest, fair and level headed person. Loyalty wasn't aimed at him...

Le Tissier - I really shouldn't need to explain...

 

You also said:

Still stands.

 

I would accept Surman, Walcott,Bale and Oxo back. What person wouldn't?, they are all class players.
To simply say you wouldn't except them back because they have played for us before is crazy.

 

I agree. Surman would not necessarily be as much of a "back in a heartbeat" decision for me, but he's a definite improvement on what we have.

 

DTLW, please stop nit-picking.

There really is no point in trying to make this an argument.

I have explained my opinion. Now leave it at that.

 

Shearer had no loyalty to us, he just want to play for Newcastle.

 

Bitchy bitchy bitch bitch bitch.

 

Yeah exactly, I'm just struggling to understand any other mindset.

RLGB, what do you think would happen if we brought Bale back? Suddenly the rest of the players (none of whom were here when Bale was EXCEPT DAVIS AND LALLANA), the management (none of whom were here when Bale was) and the board (none of whom were here when Bale was) will suddenly relapse into how they were (except, not they, because literally every person is new EXCEPT DAVIS AND LALLANA) when Bale was last here?

 

That's pretty much what I think, but RLGB seems to think otherwise.

 

Lallana was here, as was Davis, when Bale was

 

As I said above; loyalty wasn't aimed at Shearer, was aimed at Le Tiss...

Classic moment...

 

Evolution, not revolution.

 

I'm not letting you have that.

They for one person?

Classic moment.