I knew you were going to say that but that's just taking it to ridiculous extremes. What I meant was that the father should have the right to a say in the case of an abortion where it's between two consenting adults.
The horror of being raped <Goodwillie> doesn't excuse the 250,000 odd abortions every year in the UK that are nothing to do with rape.
I'm going to go straight to the point here Meds. I don't care. I have already told you anyway. What you want me to say? That's a serious question btw.
Very well then. I don't want you to say anything, just pointing out the hypocrisy of you being against abortion but in favour of terrorism. I'll leave it at that.
A guy on the internet is a hypocrite Stop the press. Where you not cheerleading the RAF in another thread? How many innocents have they killed?
Are the vast majority of pregnancies not due to an act between consenting adults? So why should the man who simply provided the sperm, have an equal say in what a woman decides to do with something inside her? Not every pregnancy is planned or wanted, so why bring a child into a world where it is not wanted? It will be - in the majority of cases - the woman who raises the child. If I banged some tart behind a boozer who I never saw again, and she gets herself up the duff, why should I be entitled to veto her decision to terminate?
Because if she was a fat hoofer, you would want to claim that there is no way on earth that you pumped her in the first place?
