He's on a 5-year deal with Watford so it'd cost a bit. Assuming it's the same one...Irankunda surely worth a punt. That Australia first goal he scored was absolute class.
He's on a 5-year deal with Watford so it'd cost a bit. Assuming it's the same one...Irankunda surely worth a punt. That Australia first goal he scored was absolute class.
I’ve just watched highlights and I said , I’m not sure who that guy is but I bet on not606 somebody has already suggested City buy himIrankunda surely worth a punt. That Australia first goal he scored was absolute class.

Yes that’s him. Valued at around £10 million allegedly.He's on a 5-year deal with Watford so it'd cost a bit. Assuming it's the same one...
No, just what I heard from friends at the club because I questioned the higher numbers that were chucked about. They said Baz was right.
Would you like a link to the club's bank statements?
Don't suppose you're hearing anything about any incomings, or are all hands on the fire sale?
Most advanced are the Croatian lads already mentioned, but you won't see any come in until after July 1st. It'll really get going once the World Cup is over.
I didn’t watch the Australia vs Turkey game. How did Yüksek play?Is that the four that came out of sergej's interview.. Think it was Luka Stojkovic, Arber Hoxha, Rokas Pukstas and Toni Fruk?
Not sure how much I fancy any of the Turkish lads after this showing
I didn’t watch the Australia vs Turkey game. How did Yüksek play?
Well at least we know he's not a greedy player.I'll admit I wasn't focusing on individuals (and im in aus at the moment so rooting for them behind England) but the entire Turkish midfield felt innefective. Only thing I noticed from yuksek is giving the ball away for the second goal
You are on fire this morning Rerver!! What have you had for breakfast? Tony the tiger frosties?Well at least we know he's not a greedy player.![]()

You can't "Forward weight" sponsorship.
It’s more to do with the performance obligation that’s assigned to the revenue. If 1/3 of said sponsorship is to do with the 28/29 season front of shirt sponsor until that “performance obligation” is satisfied you can’t recognise the revenue and it would be deferred until then if all received up front. Would assume it stays true to this as opposed to changing for the footballing industry.You can't for example sell 3 years sponsorship but receive the full value in the first year?
Wouldn't that depend on the deal struck between parties?
Can you point me to the guidance on that please?
I'd have thought if you could sell multi-year passes and receive the funds in the first year as per Newcastle then you could do similar with other income like sponsorship?
Seems counter-intuitive that you book the full value of transfer revenue in a single period but it's expressly forbidden with sponsorship.
*Ah, found it,
Revenue Recognition (FRS 102 / IFRS 15)
Had to check the spelling then, thought we are after the grandson of a legend !!! Well that and the fact he aint HungarianProbably bollocks but apparently we’ve put in a first bid for this lad…Dont shoot the Messenger…. ****ers !!!
You must log in or register to see images
Not far off G, Crunchy Nut, if not them then it's Weetabix.You are on fire this morning Rerver!! What have you had for breakfast? Tony the tiger frosties?![]()
Crunchy nut indeed.Not far off G, Crunchy Nut, if not them then it's Weetabix.