If it was, then fair play to Boro as they have done Southampton like a kipper! Mad theory but maybe, just maybe....Some Soton fans are saying that Boro set them up. That it was common knowledge that Soton spied on clubs, so Boro pounced and made a big scene in 'capturing' the culprit in action. Using the cheating as a 'get out of jail free card' just in case they lost the matches.![]()
he has been thrown under the busWell the person who did it, the young intern, has been badly let down by his superiors.
No chance he just takes off and does this stuff on his own account. He was asked/told to do it, and there are people hiding behind him.
The coach will obviously have to go: if he's not up on what his staff are doing he's useless, and if he is, he's unfit to be doing the job. There may be other guilty people, but if there is one person who should get some leeway, it's the young lad.
yep,Some Soton fans are saying that Boro set them up. That it was common knowledge that Soton spied on clubs, so Boro pounced and made a big scene in 'capturing' the culprit in action. Using the cheating as a 'get out of jail free card' just in case they lost the matches.![]()
Well if Boro are that clever, that Machiavellian, they deserve to go straight up anyway!Some Soton fans are saying that Boro set them up. That it was common knowledge that Soton spied on clubs, so Boro pounced and made a big scene in 'capturing' the culprit in action. Using the cheating as a 'get out of jail free card' just in case they lost the matches.![]()
The thing is that you CAN "spy". You can look at other teams training sessions, if you are not trespassing.I wonder how many clubs up and down the country have called their spies in, debriefed them, made sure their covers havnt been blown, and relieved them of their duties whilst handing over a thick brown envelope.
Are you talking about Southampton or the KGB???I wonder how many clubs up and down the country have called their spies in, debriefed them, made sure their covers havnt been blown, and relieved them of their duties whilst handing over a thick brown envelope.
Well the person who did it, the young intern, has been badly let down by his superiors.
No chance he just takes off and does this stuff on his own account. He was asked/told to do it, and there are people hiding behind him.
The coach will obviously have to go: if he's not up on what his staff are doing he's useless, and if he is, he's unfit to be doing the job. There may be other guilty people, but if there is one person who should get some leeway, it's the young lad.
Probably, though all he's done is what he's been asked to do and an intern can't really say no.The way I see it now, is that the young intern's career in football would surely be over - who's going to take him on after this?
I call BS
You must log in or register to see images
Wouldn't have done the taunt if he knew they were going to be punished but when he thought they were getting away with it, it was all a big joke!
MI5?The way I see it now, is that the young intern's career in football would surely be over - who's going to take him on after this?
I call BS
You must log in or register to see images
The way I see it now, is that the young intern's career in football would surely be over - who's going to take him on after this?
Oh dear
Southampton's spying on rival clubs was authorised by head coach Tonda Eckert and was a "contrived and determined plan from the top down to gain a competitive advantage", an independent disciplinary panel says.
![]()
Spygate: Southampton head coach Tonda Eckert authorised spying, panel says
Southampton's spying was authorised by head coach Tonda Eckert and was a "contrived and determined plan from the top down to gain a competitive advantage", an independent disciplinary panel says.www.bbc.co.uk
The whole club knew( well the board and staff)This bit here is absolutely damning...
This was not just because other teams had been spied on, but "because of the way in which junior members of staff were put under pressure to carry out activities which they felt were morally wrong", the panel stated.