Didnt Drax receive millions in subsidies.... seem to recall they did or are...They got fined £25m by the regulator for this, over a year ago, presumably they're rather more careful about the sourcing now.
Didnt Drax receive millions in subsidies.... seem to recall they did or are...They got fined £25m by the regulator for this, over a year ago, presumably they're rather more careful about the sourcing now.
They got fined £25m by the regulator for this, over a year ago, presumably they're rather more careful about the sourcing now.
They got fined £25m by the regulator for this, over a year ago, presumably they're rather more careful about the sourcing now.
That's just a leaf in the forest, the subsidy scheme was due to end in 2027 but has been extended to the end of the decade. That will cost the taxpayer/ bill payer an extra 4 billion.
That's just a leaf in the forest, the subsidy scheme was due to end in 2027 but has been extended to the end of the decade. That will cost the taxpayer/ bill payer an extra 4 billion.
That sounds like nonsense to me.If you think this world can sustain its self by reducing ‘meat intake’ your sadly wrong.
Reducing pig and poultry for example would pour the world into hunger. We already have alarmingly reducing birth rates as it is, reducing easy eating proteins isn’t wise.
Not new news but just a reminder.
It's about Drax and burning wood pellets.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68381160.amp
"Drax helps the UK government meet its climate targets because, on paper at least, the power station is treated as emission-free. This is because international carbon accounting rules state that greenhouse gas emissions from burning wood are counted in the country where the trees are felled as opposed to where they are burned."
It really is just all smoke and mirrors, isn't it?
"Drax helps the UK government meet its climate targets because, on paper at least, the power station is treated as emission-free. This is because international carbon accounting rules state that greenhouse gas emissions from burning wood are counted in the country where the trees are felled as opposed to where they are burned."
It really is just all smoke and mirrors, isn't it?
And if your blood is not already boiling enough, Drax realising the subsidies on burning wood are potentially going to end soon are looking at the next subsidy scam, carbon capture.
It's a complete load of bollox always has been and always will be.
I have just received todays piss take. Latest Yorkshire Water bill.
Announcing a huge investment programme of 8.3bn over the next five years. Oh goody, chopping non exec directors salaries? No dividends for five years? No bonus for execs?
Nah - **** you customer, have a 41% increase in payments.
It's to be hoped water meters work better then the two smart gas meters we had fitted last year, looking at our bill it says we have a potential saving of a few pounds if we get one. That's bollocks as they don't know I've got several watering cans I use in a summer, and the hosepipe. There's no hosepipe ban in my gardens.Why not get a water meter.
Would these 'replacements crops' grow under all the solar panels they are planning in our farmers fields?That sounds like nonsense to me.
There are so many easy available proteins without raising animals then killing them.
Pig and poultry reduction would not ‘pour the world into hunger’ especially if it was done gradually with replacement crops planted.
It's to be hoped water meters work better then the two smart gas meters we had fitted last year, looking at our bill it says we have a potential saving of a few pounds if we get one. That's bollocks as they don't know I've got several watering cans I use in a summer, and the hosepipe. There's no hosepipe ban in my gardens.
Would these 'replacements crops' grow under all the solar panels they are planning in our farmers fields?