Transfer Rumours To sack or not to sack?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should we sack Ange now?

  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .
Spurf said:
This will put tremendous pressure on the new man before he starts. Not a great idea IMO


The last manager won a Euro trophy what will you do?
Click to expand...

“Finish top 7 in the league, you’ll never sing that”

I feel way more strongly about this than I thought I would now its happened. I get all the reasons why he’s been sacked but Ange had the stones to dream out loud and then delivered on his promise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurf, remembercolinlee, Huddlejonny and 2 others
You must log in or register to see media


The painful reality is that nothing will really change until the chap hiring and then firing all these failures is gone, but we live in hope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roo
The Huddlefro said:
“Finish top 7 in the league, you’ll never sing that”

I feel way more strongly about this than I thought I would now its happened. I get all the reasons why he’s been sacked but Ange had the stones to dream out loud and then delivered on his promise.
Click to expand...

He delivered on his promise by taking us to the brink of relegation.
 
Citizen Kane. said:
You must log in or register to see media


The painful reality is that nothing will really change until the chap hiring and then firing all these failures is gone, but we live in hope.
Click to expand...

absolutely. But him and Lange can both do one.

just give free reign to Paratici to do what ever he wants, as long as it’s legal. <laugh>
 
Roo said:
absolutely. But him and Lange can both do one.

just give free reign to Paratici to do what ever he wants, as long as it’s legal. <laugh>
Click to expand...

If the Frank rumours are true, Lange is the one driving that deal. He is supposed to be very close to and a huge admirer of his fellow Dane.
 
Citizen Kane. said:
If the Frank rumours are true, Lange is the one driving that deal. He is supposed to be very close to and a huge admirer of his fellow Dane.
Click to expand...

I honestly don’t know where we go from here. No idea who the best match is for us to be honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BinghamSpur
You must log in or register to see images


If anyone was wondering whether we've made the right decision or not...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roo
Citizen Kane. said:
Mentioning Postecoglou in the same sentence as Nicholson and Burkinshaw is an insult to the latter two men, I'm sorry.
Click to expand...

I’ve no issue with it to be fair. The game’s about glory (cliche I know) and he brought us some.

I think two things can be equally right though:
A - he was massively out of his depth in this country.
B - he still delivered one of the greatest nights in our history and we can be forever grateful for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD, rockspur, BinghamSpur and 3 others
I think it’s a poor decision…won our first trophy in 17 years and we took the L’s in the league to make that happen with our injuries.

I think we’d likely got top 6 with him, but the ambition will always be top 4 with little care about winning an actual trophy.

it’s where the spreadsheet says all the money is..CL - doesn’t matter about style of play, emotions, culture, etc. (says Levy)
 
Spurlock said:
when in 2045 we are talking about the last trophy we won

you will refer back to Ange in great fondness
Click to expand...

1. I will probably be dead by then.

2. Perhaps Keithy will come to be solemnly revered by those
who never saw him at work in the flesh, as my generation
did for St Nicholson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back