Transfer Rumours Winter 2025 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If you can’t see the difference with Livermore then you’re clutching matey
Livermore tested positive for cocaine and was suspended for the rest of the season. His reasons for taking it were widely accepted. Nobody, afaik, was suggesting he should have been fired for moral reasons. And rightly so.
Zambrano tested positive for whatever it was, he's been suspended for 2 seasons, subject to appeal. He claims it was an innocent mistake, impossible to prove either way but he gets no benefit of the doubt. By saying it's morally wrong to have signed him is tantamount to firing him.
Is there really that much difference?
 
Livermore tested positive for cocaine and was suspended for the rest of the season. His reasons for taking it were widely accepted. Nobody, afaik, was suggesting he should have been fired for moral reasons. And rightly so.
Zambrano tested positive for whatever it was, he's been suspended for 2 seasons, subject to appeal. He claims it was an innocent mistake, impossible to prove either way but he gets no benefit of the doubt. By saying it's morally wrong to have signed him is tantamount to firing him.
Is there really that much difference?

Were they? I thought he got off extremely leniently.
 
Livermore tested positive for cocaine and was suspended for the rest of the season. His reasons for taking it were widely accepted. Nobody, afaik, was suggesting he should have been fired for moral reasons. And rightly so.
Zambrano tested positive for whatever it was, he's been suspended for 2 seasons, subject to appeal. He claims it was an innocent mistake, impossible to prove either way but he gets no benefit of the doubt. By saying it's morally wrong to have signed him is tantamount to firing him.
Is there really that much difference?
He was our player and we rightly supported him
Zambrano wasn’t
We did it knowing he was up on charges
That’s wrong imho
 
He was our player and we rightly supported him
Zambrano wasn’t
We did it knowing he was up on charges
That’s wrong imho
And that's where we differ, and probably always will!
If we knew, absolutely and without any doubt, that he was guilty of deliberately taking performance enhancing drugs then you'd have a good case. But we didn't know that, we just took a bit of a flyer. Opportunistic, yes. Immoral, no. All imho of course!
 
One thing you can’t moan at Acun is blowing money.

3 million on Matazo
2.5 on Joseph
3/4 million on Balloumi
1 million or so on Millar
Hughes 4/5?

certainly throwing it about.
Yeah as much as he’s spunked a lot of money and as much as he’s made mistakes. You can’t knock him because every window he goes again
 
Last edited:
And that's where we differ, and probably always will!
If we knew, absolutely and without any doubt, that he was guilty of deliberately taking performance enhancing drugs then you'd have a good case. But we didn't know that, we just took a bit of a flyer. Opportunistic, yes. Immoral, no. All imho of course!

I just don’t know why a player would take performance enhancing drugs and then go to the authorities to let them know he’s taken them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red top reader
One thing you can’t moan at Acun is blowing money.

3 million on Matazo
2.5 on Joseph
3/4 million on Balloumi
1 million or so on Millar
Hughes 4/5?

certainly throwing it about.

In fairness a lot of is reinvesting the Jaden and Greaves money. Which he still deserves credit for as some would just sit on it like previous owners