The Premier League Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Osvaldorama said:
Doesn’t solve anything.

Unless there is a sensor on the ball to record when the contact is?
Click to expand...
That's essentially what it is yes, the ball will have a chip inside it and the cameras inside the stadium will identify when players are in an offside position. It's more complicated than that but it was used at the last World Cup and it's so much better than the current line drawing system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saints14 and thereisonlyoneno7
tomw24 said:
That's essentially what it is yes, the ball will have a chip inside it and the cameras inside the stadium will identify when players are in an offside position. It's more complicated than that but it was used at the last World Cup and it's so much better than the current line drawing system.
Click to expand...

Ok cool that’s much better then. If it works instantly then that’s definitely a solution.

I really hope they start giving the benefit of the doubt to attackers more as well. Coventry’s goal should have stood. It was a joke that it was disallowed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Tissier's Laces and Saints Fan4Life
Osvaldorama said:
Doesn’t solve anything.

Unless there is a sensor on the ball to record when the contact is?
Click to expand...

The version which FIFA use involves a sensor inside the ball, but not the version which UEFA use. UEFA's is more AI-based, I believe.

The PL will be adopting UEFA's version.
 
Osvaldorama said:
Ok cool that’s much better then. If it works instantly then that’s definitely a solution.

I really hope they start giving the benefit of the doubt to attackers more as well. Coventry’s goal should have stood. It was a joke that it was disallowed.
Click to expand...

I would love to see the daylight rule introduced. The game should be in favour of the attacking team, I’d rather see a goal from an attacker who is a yard in front of the defender than an ‘offside’ from a toe or a pointing arm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedandWhiteManofKent, MIsaints, LincolnSaint and 1 other person
It is definitely the rule at fault. It was designed with the human eye in mind. As long as the attacker is tethered to not go beyond the defender, the spirit of the law exists. This wasn’t dreamed up as noses of advantage- it was meant to stop goalhanging. If there is no daylight between attacker and defender then he is tethered at the law intended.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedandWhiteManofKent, Osvaldorama, SaintsForTheWin and 4 others
......loading...... said:
It is definitely the rule at fault. It was designed with the human eye in mind. As long as the attacker is tethered to not go beyond the defender, the spirit of the law exists. This wasn’t dreamed up as noses of advantage- it was meant to stop goalhanging. If there is no daylight between attacker and defender then he is tethered at the law intended.
Click to expand...
Couldn't agree more.
 
The ****ing officials man. Goals are so important in the game, they’re the only reason the game even exists but they’re bending over backwards and turning inside out to find ways and reasons to reduce the number scored. It’s totally counter to the spirit of the game, I fecking hate the way the premier league is being officiated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaySFC, ChilcoSaint, thereisonlyoneno7 and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back