Needs a new stadium for me. Building on Leazes Park would be the most romantic option, to keep it atop the hill. Besides which, that works far better for RB who would want to do something with the land that's left over, as well as be involved in the new project.
But down the quayside is just as good. It's tired and ugly on the inside now. The fact they've done practically nothing to it tells its own story, for me. Dog and pony show - they are well aware what needs to be done. I think it'll be quayside, because it's possibly the only option that stops the current ground getting in the way. Dead land, relatively cheap, great access, then you just call it something sponsor-y - I'd imagine it'll be the Aramco Arena. Time heals - were Arsenal always at the "Emirates"? City the "Etihad"? Spurs have done it differently, but Tottenham Hotspur Stadium sounds naff. Newcastle United Arena? Honestly dont give a toss, if it means we'll be watching players like Isak and Bruno for years to come.
What if we build it like a castle and call it New Castle Arena?
