Match Day Thread Tottenham Hotspur v Chelsea

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I’d happy with the attitude of those that remained on the pitch. Porro is an absolute warrior, Vic was immense, and Dier and Hojbjerg did everything we could have asked of them playing such a high line under those circumstances. I’m shocked it took Chelsea so long to spring us given the players we had in defence.

I think Ange will take some heart from the fact that we went down swinging and didn’t just try and camp our own box. If Son scores that breakaway chance, we can but dream. Even with that the game hinged on a few very tight offside decisions, both Sterling for the 2-1 goal, but also Son’s disallowed one in the first half, even Dier’s strike was a close enough one.

But ultimately the two that got sent off have done us here. Romero’s play was utterly inexcusable. Udogie diving in like that when already on a yellow wasn’t much better. It wasn’t even a tackle he needed to make. He’s young and he’ll learn, you’d hope, but Romero has long since ran out of such excuses.

There’s a lot of dust to settle from this one and really our season will hinge on VdV being out. Even if he hadn’t got injured this game I think the high line with 9 men looks a lot different.
 
If Chelsea play like that against City, they will be taken apart.

No idea what their set up or tactics were meant to be. Played like a team of obscenely expensive strangers.
 
I should take the piss, but I respect the way Ange tried to attack when down to 9 men and the way the fans responded.

You must log in or register to see images
 

Attachments

  • giphy (4).gif
    giphy (4).gif
    1.9 MB · Views: 105
Both were reds...and both could have been sent off earlier.
They had also had 3 ruled out...although one was cancelled out by the penalty.
No idea what complaints we could have.
I agree and Ange won’t be anything like that. We at least went for it and I can’t complain with the attitude of the team and the fans were unbelievable
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee
Just a pointer but for all the chuff licking about playing bravely don't you think you were on the edge and ultimately that cost you a huge defeat?

Need to calm down you'll get more reds.. dangerous and lacked discipline... Rash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Thanks for the usual at three point lane.

In all seriousness, you guys are in for a great ride with how ange has you playing. You looked still so dangerous when you attacked and the high line was holding out surprisingly well.

You have some key players coming back but you have also lost some key players today so will be interesting how you guys fair going forward
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crackermanjack2
Just a pointer but for all the chuff licking about playing bravely don't you think you were on the edge and ultimately cost you a huge defeat?

Need to calm down.
I get what you are saying but do you just take a 2-1? We almost scored and yeah of course they got 2 late goals but I’d rather we try and equalise than roll over
 
Let’s move on but Ange must explain why the indiscipline arose and what he is going to do about it.

A brave manager would not start them for a while,
regardless of their positives. And if their replacements
are costly without the same stupidity, put the blame
firmly at the feet of said players.
 
Weirdly this game doesn't actually tell us anything about the team going forward, other than the obvious lesson that Michael Oliver is a useless **** which we (presumably) learned three or four years ago

The next few games, though, they will tell us about the team going forward: first of all against Wolves we'll likely have Davies at LB meaning the CB pairing would be Dier and one of Phillips or Dorrington, while against Villa and The Sheikh Mansour Team it wouldn't surprise me if we had a Dier/Davies pairing with Udogie back at LB

Maddison is the other big, fat maybe for those games as surely he'll be missing one or two of them, which is the least romantic way to have Bentancur come back into the team that we could have envisaged, or we could potentially reshuffle the midfield pack and move Bissouma into Maddison's role and have Hojbjerg or Skipp as the point between defence and attack (so great time for Santiago to pick up a knock on U21 duty)

In other words, maybe watch the U21s match with Cambridge tomorrow, as we might be seeing one or two of those players drafted into the first team squad for a few games coming up
 
Weirdly this game doesn't actually tell us anything about the team going forward, other than the obvious lesson that Michael Oliver is a useless **** which we (presumably) learned three or four years ago

The next few games, though, they will tell us about the team going forward: first of all against Wolves we'll likely have Davies at LB meaning the CB pairing would be Dier and one of Phillips or Dorrington, while against Villa and The Sheikh Mansour Team it wouldn't surprise me if we had a Dier/Davies pairing with Udogie back at LB

Maddison is the other big, fat maybe for those games as surely he'll be missing one or two of them, which is the least romantic way to have Bentancur come back into the team that we could have envisaged, or we could potentially reshuffle the midfield pack and move Bissouma into Maddison's role and have Hojbjerg or Skipp as the point between defence and attack (so great time for Santiago to pick up a knock on U21 duty)

In other words, maybe watch the U21s match with Cambridge tomorrow, as we might be seeing one or two of those players drafted into the first team squad for a few games coming up
I reckon it will be royal and Dier centre defence for the next game. Dier came out with a lot of credit and in the next few weeks we will need his experience