Off Topic Russell Brand

[Smug in Boots]

The truth is, the people in charge are a tiny minority, they rely on a number of factors such as people's innate individuality, weakness for money, lobbying, pressure etc There are people who have reached such a level of wealth that no material possession matters and they wish to remake world, this is unfathomable to alot of people because they're stuck in the daily grind, but that's where they want you, just be good little cattle and keep consuming, keep your blinkers on, keep viewing things through a materialist lens.

See, that's where these discussions fall down, when people post opinions and guesswork as facts and the truth. As if you're revealing some previously unknown conspiracy to the gullible riff raff.

I'd guess that you're no different to the 'good little cattle' you obviously look down on ...

... doing the same things, consuming and thinking about money.

 

[alcoauth]

See, that's where these discussions fall down, when people post opinions and guesswork as facts and the truth. As if you're revealing some previously unknown conspiracy to the gullible riff raff.

I'd guess that you're no different to the 'good little cattle' you obviously look down on ...

... doing the same things, consuming and thinking about money.

It's literally true and verifiable, go and look at rich lists, find LLCs associated with them, look at lobbying, donors and NGOs associated with these people. If you can't join those dots you're likely complicit to some extent with their ideas, this will of course backfire.

 

[The Legendary Tongue]

Barrymore joining in . . . .

You must log in or register to see images

 

[Smug in Boots]

It's literally true and verifiable, go and look at rich lists, find LLCs associated with them, look at lobbying, donors and NGOs associated with these people. If you can't join those dots you're likely complicit to some extent with their ideas, this will of course backfire.

You're saying it's a tiny minority and seem 100% sure of your facts ...

... so, how many people are you talking about.

Join the dots and spell it out clearly.

In fact, if you have all the information, as you claim to, why don't you just make it easy for us and name them.

 

[alcoauth]

You're saying it's a tiny minority and seem 100% sure of your facts ...

... so, how many people are you talking about.

Join the dots and spell it out clearly.

In fact, if you have all the information, as you claim to, why don't you just make it easy for us and name them.

You know why. The narrative is already written, the counter already prepared and seeded into people's minds for the best part of a century. Yet you already know this.

 

[Smug in Boots]

You know why. The narrative is already written, the counter already prepared and seeded into people's minds for the best part of a century. Yet you already know this.

So, as I knew, you can't back up your 'facts' ...

... nothing personal, no one can ever give a straight answer to a straight question.

It's always diversions, smokescreens and internet clichés.

 

[alcoauth]

So, as I knew, you can't back up your 'facts' ...

... nothing personal, no one can ever give a straight answer to a straight question.

It's always diversions, smokescreens and internet clichés.

You'll be dragged along kicking and screaming in the end.

 

[Smug in Boots]

You'll be dragged along kicking and screaming in the end.

"And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
And I looked, and behold a pale horse
And his name that sat on him was death, and hell followed with him"

You must log in or register to see media

 

[The Exile II]

Second investigation underway.

This one makes it a little more interesting - the complaint is from a woman who reported allegations repeatedly over four years and whom Brand had previously accused of harassment in 2017.

There's going to be a lot of this isn't there. Serial shagger, obsessed fans, lots of grudges to hold....

 

[Disco down under]

Second investigation underway.



This one makes it a little more interesting - the complaint is from a woman who reported allegations repeatedly over four years and whom Brand had previously accused of harassment in 2017.



There's going to be a lot of this isn't there. Serial shagger, obsessed fans, lots of grudges to hold....

Might also just be a bit rapey.

 

[The Exile II]

Might also just be a bit rapey.

Might be. Absolutely could be, given the way he behaved. Plenty of room for doubt in these situations though, unfortunately. His advances won't have been turned down for the vast majority of the time, so you'd have to prove it wasn't just a one nighter that went no further and the complainer wasn't happy about it.

The timeline they're reporting is the allegations being made after he accused her of harassment.

 

[Nordic]

David Walliams (nee Williams not his stage name) trying to hush things up

he’s a creep. Could be next up.

 

[Snaggey]

he’s a creep. Could be next up.

I agree, he is really creepy.
Young lads would be my guess.

 

[The Redbaron]

I agree, he is really creepy.
Young lads would be my guess.

Some say "Hiding in plain " ala Saville, sight helps in slipping under the radar

 

[Oldsandy]

he’s a creep. Could be next up.

You found him a bit unsettling too, mate? Something behind his eyes. But then, I could just be being unkind.

 

[Nordic]

You found him a bit unsettling too, mate? Something behind his eyes. But then, I could just be being unkind.

yeah, don't know what it is and perhaps I am being unkind. But something not quite right there for me, other than the fact he bats and bowls. Remember him being on a talk show a few years back and he was desperate for attention but cringingly unfunny - switched it off.

 

[The Exile II]

Some say "Hiding in plain " ala Saville, sight helps in slipping under the radar

He's hiding behind the misconception that he's gay, not to put too fine a point on it.

It's a hell of a shield against many things you wouldn't otherwise get away with these days - nobody wants to be seen as a homophobe.

 

[Nig]

What you need to remember is that what you're talking about is nothing more than your opinions many of which are based on guesswork ...

... if you think posting fictional facts on chat forums makes any difference to anything you're deluded.

You claim that everything that happens is done deliberately to make the rich even richer whether it's the emergence of a virus to the crashing of the economy.

It's not deliberate, it's just that the wealthy take advantage of situations as they always have.

My fictional facts are better backed up than your so called opinions

My argument with you has ended as far as I'm concerned since you put people down with any debate you don't agree with without any fact based on your own opinions.
My parting shot across your bows would be to look at the media and government sticking up for Israel.
I bet you do too

 

[RLB's Beautiful Face]

Look at the British medical journal not pharmas claims or mainstream media who remember categorically stated you couldn't catch or pass on COVID if vaccinated.
That went well .

https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1892
Remember, the FDA are corrupt, and that is also stated within the BMJ.
But if you're too lazy to look, I'm not doing all the legwork for you

Were you one of those screaming at people to have their vaccine, pitchfork in hand ?

I'm 99% sure very few people (if anyone) ever claimed the vaccine made you immune / unable to pass it on. That was a common misconception as I recall. It was generally advertised as simply lowering the chance, and lessening the symptoms.

 

[The Exile II]

I'm 99% sure very few people (if anyone) ever claimed the vaccine made you immune / unable to pass it on. That was a common misconception as I recall. It was generally advertised as simply lowering the chance, and lessening the symptoms.

If it wasn't outright stated ( I think it was), It was very, very heavily implied. Along the lines of get the jab, protect other people.

They also lied about the vaccine's efficacy and continue to do so despite some people being on their fifth or sixth 'booster'. Suggesting we may have needed a second one in January 21 would have had you labelled a COVID denier....