Match Day Thread Norwich v Hull City

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

City to win?

  • Hull City

  • Norwich City

  • Bore draw

Results are only viewable after voting.
big vern said:
Norwich were physically a much bigger team than City. Furthermore their passing was more slick and they looked to be a much fitter team. Vinagre did not look match fit and the protection he was offered by the young winger was non existent. I could have dropped my pie when there were no changes for the start of the second half.
Click to expand...
A creampie no doubt!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights and big vern
Evington said:
To be fair the ****ing linesman (assistant referee) needs to keep up with play. It's not like it was a slick passing move that caught him out it was a bloody long ball. The young man behind me called him a ****ing bald **** more than once. I suggest more relevant might be to replace bald with slow.
Click to expand...
How about slow, bald ****? Covers all bases that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evington
LeftSaidFred said:
How about slow, bald ****? Covers all bases that way.
Click to expand...

Yes but I think the vitriol in the '****ing' emphasised how exasperated the young man felt. At least that's what I put it down to.

Why else would you start a sentence with '****ing'?

And the omission of the word could then be misinterpreted as a simple statement of fact.

I guess we'll never know.
 
I can only assume Norwich's left back is in for his attacking play! Or the way he completely nullified that wonder down the wing Traore
 
Evington said:
To be fair the ****ing linesman (assistant referee) needs to keep up with play. It's not like it was a slick passing move that caught him out it was a bloody long ball. The young man behind me called him a ****ing bald **** more than once. I suggest more relevant might be to replace bald with slow.
Click to expand...
How things have progressed since the bad old days when the ref was simply labelled at many football grounds as a 'Bow legged bastard dressed in black'...:emoticon-0103-cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: rovertiger and Evington
HCAFCHangout said:
If you're into tactics then this thread about Norwich is pretty good. Highlights what went wrong

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...

Some of that is interesting but some of it just looks like generic cliche to me.

The bit about them using the keeper and centre backs to have a 3v2 against our strikers and us having no idea what to do about it made me laugh. If there's one thing our team is very familiar with, it's the role of the keeper in playing out from the back.
 
Just shows how out of his depth LR is that a random guy on twitter can completely dissect our play
 
Tigerboy98 said:
Just shows how out of his depth LR is that a random guy on twitter can completely dissect our play
Click to expand...

These same guys could dissect Pep and Klopp. I wouldn't discredit a manager because of it. He also dissected the winning manager's gameplan
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back