Yes but I think the vitriol in the '****ing' emphasised how exasperated the young man felt. At least that's what I put it down to. Why else would you start a sentence with '****ing'? And the omission of the word could then be misinterpreted as a simple statement of fact. I guess we'll never know.
I can only assume Norwich's left back is in for his attacking play! Or the way he completely nullified that wonder down the wing Traore
How things have progressed since the bad old days when the ref was simply labelled at many football grounds as a 'Bow legged bastard dressed in black'...
Put Lionel Messi in league 2 and he’d get subbed off after Jack who drinks in the gun & partridge gave him 2 dead legs and a Chinese burn.
Considering Idah's goal was worth a good chunk of that as well. Probably was about a 0.7 chance. They did have lots of shots from distance
Some of that is interesting but some of it just looks like generic cliche to me. The bit about them using the keeper and centre backs to have a 3v2 against our strikers and us having no idea what to do about it made me laugh. If there's one thing our team is very familiar with, it's the role of the keeper in playing out from the back.
These same guys could dissect Pep and Klopp. I wouldn't discredit a manager because of it. He also dissected the winning manager's gameplan
