That 1st innings declaration is looking a really poor decision at the moment.
Equally as picking bairstow to keep wicketThat 1st innings declaration is looking a really poor decision at the moment.
Was Anderson injured. When Broad and Robinson were getting no joy at the end, it had to be changed. No?Highly likely that it cost us the game.
Reckless and stupid.
Nonsense, that game was full of match-changing incidents, early declaration was one of many.Highly likely that it cost us the game.
Reckless and stupid.
Anderson got little joy all the game, Broad and Robinson were taking wickets. I don't think the pitch/conditions were favourable to Anderson.Was Anderson injured. When Broad and Robinson were getting no joy at the end, it had to be changed. No?
Perhaps.... but more of the same got more of the same...Anderson got little joy all the game, Broad and Robinson were taking wickets. I don't think the pitch/conditions were favourable to Anderson.
We'll never know. Great game, shame we lost but there's 4 more to go and I'm sure we've learnt something. We move on!Perhaps.... but more of the same got more of the same...
Nonsense, that game was full of match-changing incidents, early declaration was one of many.
What if we'd picked up a wicket or two after that declaration, we'll never know will we. Also it's nowt to do with math, it's stats.Loads of test matches are full of match changing decisions, that’s obvious. Unforced errors such as dropped catches or missed run outs. It’s all part of the game.
To declare in your first innings when you’re best batsman is seeing it like a football and he’s scoring for fun WHILST your innings total is still under par is a forced, reckless and stupid mistake that probably cost us the match.
Only the 4th time in test history a team has lost after declaring in the first innings.
Do the math.
What if we'd picked up a wicket or two after that declaration, we'll never know will we. Also it's nowt to do with math, it's stats.
Questionable decision yes, but it was made at the end of the first day, there were plenty of match-changing moments in the next 4 to influence the result. Maybe Aus were just a bit better than us? That's a bigger issue for me than a bit of unusual decision makingWe didn’t though did we?
That’s because batting conditions were as good as you could get.
Stupid decision.
Their record at Lords isn’t too shabby either.