I’ll ask the question again though. Who is a more credible PM. Starmer or the ****show that is Boris. Not saying that the Labour Party aren’t in a bad way - they firmly are, I despise Momentum - but the state of the Tories man - Williamson, fuel, the USA deal, lorry drivers, most of the handling of Covid, cash for friends, that vile car crash Patel, Rees Mogg, - it’s farcical. Not sure why people think the car crash of Labour is unelectable when the car crash of the Tories and their buffoon of an absent leader are electable. If you compare trust in a PM I’d have Starmer - he’s rational- he just has devastation beneath him, but so does Johnson tbh
To be honest you are pushing on an open door.
Of course Boris likes to project the image of a bufoon.
He does it so well, I think it's genuine.
Yet Labour still fails to win an election.
WHY?
I think it's all down to the activities of The Far Left.
Over the last 50 years, whenever The Far Left have APPEARED to have control of The Labour Party, the middle of the road, left of centre, voters have deserted in numbers.
And I think that they will stay away untill they are sure that these people with the agenda which is ailien to the majority of us.
Starmer, in trying to reverse the rules that were changed to enable movements such as Momentum to gain so much influence, is TRYING to correct the situation.
As he rightly points out when he claims to have become a politician because he wants to change things, to do that you have to win elections.
But the only people who can bring about this change are the Party Members.
And while moderates stay at home and ignore Politics, the followers of Momentum join the party and attend meetings and use their votes.

