Harry, I think
I'm about to watch the interview though so for us who have only read a few transcripts it will be better to watch it and get more of a feel about what is said...
Off Topic The Royal Family ...
- Thread starter Smug in Boots
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I'm about to watch the interview though so for us who have only read a few transcripts it will be better to watch it and get more of a feel about what is said...
Harry, I think
I'm about to watch the interview though so for us who have only read a few transcripts it will be better to watch it and get more of a feel about what is said...
Wrong, you just made it up tbh.
Think they said in the interview it wasn't the Queen or PhillipHarry, I think
I'm about to watch the interview though so for us who have only read a few transcripts it will be better to watch it and get more of a feel about what is said...
No, I definitely did not. I read that Harry says he was shocked when it was mentioned.
Tbf it's you that has form for lying. No need to accuse me of that.
Not at all.
They made a serious allegation then refused to say who they were talking about.
Last edited:
What a pathetic attempt at diversion.
You made up something you can't prove so insult me without proof ...
... facts seem to have no bearing on anything you spout.
I didn't try and divert anything. We were talking about the Royal Family.
You called me a liar. I responded with the reason why I made the comment.
I then reminded you that you have form for lying. Which was shown at the time.
Nothing wrong with that.
Well there's never any proof in instances like that unless you were there.
You're being stupidly obnoxious again for some reason. I'll leave you and your alcohol alone for the night
Well there's never any proof in instances like that unless you were there.
You're being stupidly obnoxious again for some reason. I'll leave you and your alcohol alone for the night
Exactly what I just said despite your idiotic claims.
Only in your mind, which has been proved to be suspect and biased time after time.
You said someone was concerned about the colour of the baby ....
... but, as usual, can't back up what you've said.
Why didn't they just blame the 'racist' comment on Philip, we would have all had a jolly good giggle, 'thats our Philip', and it all would have been forgotten about, instead of all this whodunit.
He's supposed to be a rough tough soldier ...
... ffs have the balls to name someone if you're calling them out
She’s lying. Anyone who knows people can see she’s lying.
This Kate bit is the third time she’s clearly lied.
Forced focus, heavy blinking, and micro pauses in replies.
That’s a hat-trick of the biggest giveaways.
This Kate bit is the third time she’s clearly lied.
Forced focus, heavy blinking, and micro pauses in replies.
That’s a hat-trick of the biggest giveaways.
I'm more concerned about the massive seagulls that have been ****ting down her right shoulder.
The leading questions and 'shock horror' faces from Oprah are pure amateur dramatics ...
..."What light through yonder window breaks Brian?"
Somebodys pinched my sombrero
Well-Known Member
You must log in or register to see images
According to my source on Royal succession (the wife), this stuff about the kid not getting a title is bollocks too. Apparently, he's too many generations removed from the Queen to get one yet and will have to wait until Charles is king.