Yeah right, of course he was!
I could ask you the same question.
Even IF he was only "a couple of hundred thousand" that defeats your argument in itself!! Never mind then the cost of the others. Why on earth would they pay any fee (permanent or loan) if they were simply asset stripping? Please Syd don't bother answering, just let it go now.
I think we have vastly different ideas of what asset stripping is which is why a few posts ago I suggested everyone is entitled to their opinion.
