Off Topic Cricket World Cup

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Taufel (the umpire quoted)also said 'the act' could be when it's hits Stokes bat, by which time they had completed two runs, meaning six was the right call.

The rules say the act must be the wilful act of a fielder so doesn't cover the ball hitting Stokes' bat. Unless of course the fielder deliberately aimed for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
Excellent win, shame they blew it last week as they'd be pulling some points back on the leaders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: x
Still on cloud 9 after Sunday, what a match. Was brilliant to see all the Yorkies and ex Yorkies involved throughout the tournament too. Was only last September I was stood with Plunkett as he was giving interviews at Headingley for his final appearance. I won't lie either, I thought he was past his best at that time, then he puts in those great bowling performances. Legends all of them
 
The only bad thing about Sunday was that we weren't playing Australia. Imagine beating them via a controversial run and a super over. How sweet would that have been!
That would have been sweet, it was a shame we had to beat such a good set of lads like NZ in the end. Still cheating despite everything as Roys dismissal proved, contrast that to Guptill who instantly signalled for a six when his mate touched the line!
 
Still on cloud 9 after Sunday, what a match. Was brilliant to see all the Yorkies and ex Yorkies involved throughout the tournament too. Was only last September I was stood with Plunkett as he was giving interviews at Headingley for his final appearance. I won't lie either, I thought he was past his best at that time, then he puts in those great bowling performances. Legends all of them
Yeah, I assumed he'd be the one to go when Archer came through. His stats are great though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HullCityAFC1904
its significant that when England lost matches in the group stage, Plunkett was not in the team.
Absolutely. We were searching a long time for a bowler who'd pick up wickets in the middle overs when the balls doing nothing. Never believed it would be him, or 'his type'. It seems a lot of teams just triy to fill the middle overs using up their weakest bowlers. Plunkett made this a specialism with his cross seam