You'll not see them stripes on Catts!You must log in or register to see images
Here's the back of it![]()
Last year of Adidas deal - think this was something that was already set in motion.1. Gutted it's not Hummel.
2. Is it all white on the back, or are there stripes?
3. Gutted it's not Hummel.
I saw on Twitter this morning pics of it before Betdaq pulled out. It looked much better. I can't find the tweet now otherwise I'd post it on here.Last year of Adidas deal - think this was something that was already set in motion.
Agree with most - far too white! I also don't like the red band behind the charity logo - think it might look better if that was just the text
That said - I will buy it and I will wear it!!!
It would definitely look better with black writing in front of the red and white instead of a red band almost making it a cross on the chest! Think that's the thing that I really don't like.I saw on Twitter this morning pics of it before Betdaq pulled out. It looked much better. I can't find the tweet now otherwise I'd post it on here.
I've not liked most of the adidas ones when they've first come out but they've all, except the last really white one and the thin stripes, grown on me eventually.It would definitely look better with black writing in front of the red and white instead of a red band almost making it a cross on the chest! Think that's the thing that I really don't like.
Might be a grower - first shirt I haven't liked for a long time
That's the one I was talking about earlier! It does look much better doesn't it?This looks miles better:
You must log in or register to see images
Absolutely! Betdaq have pulled out of shirt sponsorship completely - but this smacks of someone who doesn't give a damn about football fans doing something on the cheapThat's the one I was talking about earlier! It does look much better doesn't it?
I like that we've given the space to a worthy cause but if what @Nads says is true, its shoddy execution.Absolutely! Betdaq have pulled out of shirt sponsorship completely - but this smacks of someone who doesn't give a damn about football fans doing something on the cheap
It's "cheap" for something that costs £50 if that is the caseI like that we've given the space to a worthy cause but if what @Nads says is true, its shoddy execution.
Definitely.It's "cheap" for something that costs £50 if that is the case
That is absolutely disgracefulYou must log in or register to see imagesYou must log in or register to see images
See above.
That is absolutely disgraceful
I think it's ****ing hideous, personally, and the Sid wallet will not be depleted by its purchase.
I just don't understand why people make something as simple as red and white stripes so complicated. I'll stick with the 1973 replica until they come up with something that I don't have to explain to people, or which doesn't require that other Sunderland fans explain it to me...
You must log in or register to see imagesYou must log in or register to see images
See above.