leave her there

She’s a refugee in a foreign land. Where else would they send her but back to her own country?

 

those two drug smugglers in Thailand did about six years before coming back, that bird who took pain killers to Egypt did three years before being released. whats the problem?

 

whats your point then?

 

"They" being who exactly? You were saying it was the free army demanding it. So the question I asked is still unanswered.

 

But it is really.
Just who the **** has the final say then?

 

That citizenship has to count for something otherwise we can scrap it and international law.

 

No, it isn’t.
And honestly **** knows but trying to apply western standards to Syria was intentionally dense on his part.

 

You're point being?

They only spend upto 7 years then come back anyway

 

but not the law in that country? you commit an offence in a foreign country but they can't prosecute you? just send you back to you county of origin?

 

What if they just wanted rid? I’m sure blokes named Dave from Braintree could sympathise with that view.

 

I was replying to a post saying that every country just sends felon's back without gaoling anyone. I was just pointing out that was wrong.

 

I didn't say that at all you lying ****ing ****cunt.

 

This post needs an animal gif.

 

what exactly are you saying?

wouldn't it be better is she, and the rest were tried over there?

 

so no punishment for the Killer/Rapist/Swindler?!?

ok

 

No, I’m saying it should be their choice. That’s assuming they have some form of working legal system as we’d recognise it across the country which appears to not be the case.

 

For us, yeah. For the WestWindsRs and Comms of Damascus, maybe not.

 

please log in to view this image