leave her there

that's actually funny.

 

It wasn't intentional, it was just my next dancing animal gif, looking back I see what you mean though

 

but don't you think Syria should have a chance to prosecute the terrorists in their own land first? go through their law courts and produce a verdict? then if they are found not guilty then send them back to us and then we can prosecute them through our law courts? if something happened over here do you think we should just ship them back out to Pakistan training camps without prosecuting them first?

or don't you trust the 'middle-east' judiciary?

 

Not sure what you mean by terrorists, are we talking solely men here?

In regards to women such as Begum, they are in refugee camps, and the Kurdish troops running them, don't want them there, they just want rid and are calling on the countries to take their nationals back.

 

Would you be against the deportation of an illegal immigrant who had commited a serious offence in this country?

 

That’s unlikely as she’s outside the reach of the Syrian Gvt currently. Otherwise they’d probably arrest her.

 

But she's still in Syria?

 

But out of the reach of the Syrian Gvt. She’s with the Syrian free army. Mostly Kurds.

 

read the first bit and no

 

I've thought all along in this thread, they ain't got a clue about refugee camps or the jurisdiction over them.

https://www.unhcr.org/excom/scip/3ae68cd10/personal-security-refugees.html

 

why shouldn't we prosecute the said illegal then send him on his way after a 20 stretch

 

The taxpayer funds a 20 year stretch for an illegal? But doesn’t fund prison time for a Brit? That’s all kinds of confused.

 

I ain't clicking no links.

So she's in Syria still?

But out of reach of the goverment?

The goverment her only chance out off there?

 

That's pretty much how the law here and many other Countries works.

 

Well, the Syrian Free Army doesn’t want her and is insisting that we take her back. Not just Brits, but all foreigners in the camps.

 

so you wouldn't gaol a terrorist?

that's all kind of ****ed up

 

I didn’t say that.

What is it with this thread??!!

 

Is it their decision to make, or do their government perhaps have a voice in running things too? How would it be if a group here suggested a reciprocal scheme? I reckon there'd be a fair bit of tutting in a few quarters. Immigrants are a net benefit after all.

 

You may have noticed it’s not exactly going smoothly over there so it’s not really a fair comparison.