the dancing bear is like Comm having a go at me on the politics thread, and i'm just like, yeah, yeah.
that's actually funny.You must log in or register to see images

the dancing bear is like Comm having a go at me on the politics thread, and i'm just like, yeah, yeah.
that's actually funny.You must log in or register to see images

that's actually funny.![]()

I can’t accept that. What @Treble says has the ring on truth to it. Javid is playing a political game and trying to make sure no **** sticks to him. His decision will probably get overturned.
Syria neither invited nor wants these people. Just because they invaded the country why should Syria be called upon to accept responsibility for them?
but don't you think Syria should have a chance to prosecute the terrorists in their own land first? go through their law courts and produce a verdict? then if they are found not guilty then send them back to us and then we can prosecute them through our law courts? if something happened over here do you think we should just ship them back out to Pakistan training camps without prosecuting them first?
or don't you trust the 'middle-east' judiciary?
but don't you think Syria should have a chance to prosecute the terrorists in their own land first? go through their law courts and produce a verdict? then if they are found not guilty then send them back to us and then we can prosecute them through our law courts? if something happened over here do you think we should just ship them back out to Pakistan training camps without prosecuting them first?
or don't you trust the 'middle-east' judiciary?
but don't you think Syria should have a chance to prosecute the terrorists in their own land first? go through their law courts and produce a verdict? then if they are found not guilty then send them back to us and then we can prosecute them through our law courts? if something happened over here do you think we should just ship them back out to Pakistan training camps without prosecuting them first?
or don't you trust the 'middle-east' judiciary?
But she's still in Syria?That’s unlikely as she’s outside the reach of the Syrian Gvt currently. Otherwise they’d probably arrest her.
But she's still in Syria?
Would you be against the deportation of an illegal immigrant who had commited a serious offence in this country?
But out of the reach of the Syrian Gvt. She’s with the Syrian free army. Mostly Kurds.
Would you be against the deportation of an illegal immigrant who had commited a serious offence in this country?
The taxpayer funds a 20 year stretch for an illegal? But doesn’t fund prison time for a Brit? That’s all kinds of confused.why shouldn't we prosecute the said illegal then send him on his way after a 20 stretch
I ain't clicking no links.But out of the reach of the Syrian Gvt. She’s with the Syrian free army. Mostly Kurds.
why shouldn't we prosecute the said illegal then send him on his way after a 20 stretch
I ain't clicking no links.
So she's in Syria still?
But out of reach of the goverment?
The goverment her only chance out off there?
The taxpayer funds a 20 year stretch for an illegal? But doesn’t fund prison time for a Brit? That’s all kinds of confused.
I didn’t say that.so you wouldn't gaol a terrorist?
that's all kind of ****ed up
Well, the Syrian Free Army doesn’t want her and is insisting that we take her back. Not just Brits, but all foreigners in the camps.
Is it their decision to make, or do their government perhaps have a voice in running things too? How would it be if a group here suggested a reciprocal scheme? I reckon there'd be a fair bit of tutting in a few quarters.