Off Topic UK / EU Future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you answer the question why the EU Commission has decided to bypass the obvious French ports in favour of longer trips to Holland and Belgium.?
This is not a question to be decided by the EU Commission. It is decided by the demands of transport logistics and shipping companies. The ports of Rotterdam and Antwerp are much bigger than any of the French ports and can handle this within their present capacity.
 
Can you answer the question why the EU Commission has decided to bypass the obvious French ports in favour of longer trips to Holland and Belgium.?

I already have. They cannot take the chance of goods being held up in UK ports. This is why they have helped finance the direct southern routes from Ireland to France and Spain and now have agreed finance to expand the northern corridor.
 
This is not a question to be decided by the EU Commission. It is decided by the demands of transport logistics and shipping companies. The ports of Rotterdam and Antwerp are much bigger than any of the French ports and can handle this within their present capacity.

Politicians in France from Macron down have a different opinion than you. They are livid that the Commission has bypassed the French ports and are trying to change the decision.

France's national debt is ballooning, it is currently vying with Spain on which EU country can reach the magic 100% debt /GDP ratio first. With unemployment rising again a lot of the present freight traffic from Ireland could be lost.
 
Why don't you want to deal with the known problems in the UK over transport and customs with border control I wonder? You cannot find a single report of the Government investing a penny into these systems, yet you complain about the EU getting on and doing something. You want the UK to be an isolated island, and now as others help you to achieve that dream, you complain.
 
Why don't you want to deal with the known problems in the UK over transport and customs with border control I wonder? You cannot find a single report of the Government investing a penny into these systems, yet you complain about the EU getting on and doing something. You want the UK to be an isolated island, and now as others help you to achieve that dream, you complain.

Wrong again, I want the UK to be an extremely successful nation unshackled by the restrictions of trade currently afflicting us by being a member of the EU. None of us are in a position to gauge the preparedness of the UK government. It should have factored in the probability of a no deal from the start. That is the problem when too many 'remainers' are involved with the negotiations.

It appears the French have wasted their investment in ports destined to be bypassed. Not much hope for the 15% unemployed in Nord-Pas de Calais.
 
Politicians in France from Macron down have a different opinion than you. They are livid that the Commission has bypassed the French ports and are trying to change the decision.

France's national debt is ballooning, it is currently vying with Spain on which EU country can reach the magic 100% debt /GDP ratio first. With unemployment rising again a lot of the present freight traffic from Ireland could be lost.
The role of the EU Commission is the upholding and admin. of existing treaties not the fixing of shipping lines. If a Reeder such as Maersk decides to avoid Hamburg and go to Bremerhaven instead then that is their decision. I think you will find that any decision made on this does not originate from the EU. commission, just that you want to be able to blame them for everything and, at the same time, take a joy in having a prod at France at every opportunity.
 
Wrong again, I want the UK to be an extremely successful nation unshackled by the restrictions of trade currently afflicting us by being a member of the EU. None of us are in a position to gauge the preparedness of the UK government. It should have factored in the probability of a no deal from the start. That is the problem when too many 'remainers' are involved with the negotiations.

It appears the French have wasted their investment in ports destined to be bypassed. Not much hope for the 15% unemployed in Nord-Pas de Calais.

So how do you propose to get short shelf life products through clogged up ports? This has got nothing to do with the EU planning. We have been told that the planning goes as far as operation Brock. Even the MPs in Kent who were strongly for Brexit are now saying the whole county will come to a standstill. Your problem, so stop trying to get the blame passed onto others. You voted for it, now you must own it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hornet-Fez
The role of the EU Commission is the upholding and admin. of existing treaties not the fixing of shipping lines. If a Reeder such as Maersk decides to avoid Hamburg and go to Bremerhaven instead then that is their decision. I think you will find that any decision made on this does not originate from the EU. commission, just that you want to be able to blame them for everything and, at the same time, take a joy in having a prod at France at every opportunity.

You have obviously missed the main point of the EU Commission handing out grants which could potentially run into billions of euros. The Commission ignored geographically closer to Ireland ports such as Roscoff and Cherbourg which means they miss out on extra funds to upgrade their facilities.
 
So how do you propose to get short shelf life products through clogged up ports? This has got nothing to do with the EU planning. We have been told that the planning goes as far as operation Brock. Even the MPs in Kent who were strongly for Brexit are now saying the whole county will come to a standstill. Your problem, so stop trying to get the blame passed onto others. You voted for it, now you must own it.

The problem will be for French and other EU producers. This will give a boost to UK farmers to increase demand of their produce. Thankfully the UK will soon be out of the wasteful CAP which discriminates severely against third world producers.
 
You have obviously missed the main point of the EU Commission handing out grants which could potentially run into billions of euros. The Commission ignored geographically closer to Ireland ports such as Roscoff and Cherbourg which means they miss out on extra funds to upgrade their facilities.

You should keep up. They have already had extra funding and are running additional sailings. The new funding is for the northern routes.
 
The problem will be for French and other EU producers. This will give a boost to UK farmers to increase demand of their produce. Thankfully the UK will soon be out of the wasteful CAP which discriminates severely against third world producers.

Marks and Spencer send millions of sandwiches everyday from Northampton to Paris via the tunnel. They have warned that any delay on the roads or at customs will make their business unworkable, with a loss of revenue for the company and the exchequer.
 
You should keep up. They have already had extra funding and are running additional sailings. The new funding is for the northern routes.

No, the routes have just been announced and funding will follow, that is why the French politicians are whinging about being left out. I thought you read French papers?

This might help.

President of Calais region furious over 'scandalous' move to cut out ...

Alternatively try listening to the French Transport Minister, Elizabeth Borne, she is fuming about missing out on the investment.
 
You have obviously missed the main point of the EU Commission handing out grants which could potentially run into billions of euros. The Commission ignored geographically closer to Ireland ports such as Roscoff and Cherbourg which means they miss out on extra funds to upgrade their facilities.
The point being that Antwerp and Rotterdam would not need to upgrade their facilities. It all depends on where the majority of Irish trade is going to SH. Antwerp and Rotterdam are closer to major centres of population than Cherbourg or Le Havre, and also have access to the Rhine. But I repeat that the EU. Commission is only responsible for the handing out of grants not the choosing of shipping lines.
 
Marks and Spencer send millions of sandwiches everyday from Northampton to Paris via the tunnel. They have warned that any delay on the roads or at customs will make their business unworkable, with a loss of revenue for the company and the exchequer.
What self respecting Frenchman would eat sandwiches from England Frenchie <laugh>
 
Marks and Spencer send millions of sandwiches everyday from Northampton to Paris via the tunnel. They have warned that any delay on the roads or at customs will make their business unworkable, with a loss of revenue for the company and the exchequer.

Is this a joke?

The French may miss out on crappy white plastic bread so they will have to have a French baguette. Mon dieu!!!!!!
 
The point being that Antwerp and Rotterdam would not need to upgrade their facilities. It all depends on where the majority of Irish trade is going to SH. Antwerp and Rotterdam are closer to major centres of population than Cherbourg or Le Havre, and also have access to the Rhine. But I repeat that the EU. Commission is only responsible for the handing out of grants not the choosing of shipping lines.

The Commission choses which ports it pumps millions of euros in, of course it has a knock on commercial effect. I'm sure much of the current Irish exports head South.
 
It doesn't matter how you look at it, the EU is making plans to avoid trade grinding to a halt in the UK. It is the right thing to do, especially when you see that it is all part of an integrated transport route. Calais will still be the gateway for goods for the UK, and they have received plenty of funding from the UK for security measures. Meanwhile increased sailings between Dublin and Cherbourg have been announced, reducing the need for quite so many lorries to catch two ferries.
 
The Commission choses which ports it pumps millions of euros in, of course it has a knock on commercial effect. I'm sure much of the current Irish exports head South.
By choosing Antwerp or Rotterdam they don't have to pump any money anywhere SH. By handing out grants they are simply reacting to decisions made elsewhere. It also makes environmental sense because bigger ships (and therefore fewer) can be used - both Antwerp and Rotterdam can take ships of up to 16 metres draught and 15,000 TEU + capacity, currently only Le Havre can manage these.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.