The pitch invasion against City was much more people and also a lot nastier in terms of action too. You're right about Blackpool doing it against Huddersfield but i think remember the punishment so will take your word for it. As part of the os deal didn't they have a time limit imposed before they could sell up if they wanted to keep 100 percent ofit?
Here's the background to what's going on at West Ham, written before the weekend. http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...ings-hooligans-icf-action-group-a8244951.html
I don't think I'd want them to play behind closed doors to be honest. I think they're far more likely to play badly with a pack of braying idiots behind them (now there's a thought!)
I don't think it's warranted either to be honest, am I the only one who think it's been blown slightly out of proportion? Didn't realise realise it was that long actually, though I think they can sell if they want but only if they're willing to give up a percentage... so probably amounts to the same thing really.
That's bit unfair. Our lame gaffer has broken no laws, and he hasn't acted in a deplorable way. He's just a bit crap at his job.
Wigan and WHU have gotten the same punishment. Great to see the FA being consistant in these matters...Both clubs now have to face the mighty Saints in the next match of their respective competitions....Really is a deterrent for any fan looking to cause mischief
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43369490 Now that's a proper pitch invasion. West Ham? Bunch of pussies.
4.30am me..........enjoying a large glass of red at the mo..........goalllllllllllllllllllllllllllll city 1 up
