Go back and remind yourself of what I said.
I believe you actually said he wasn't good enough to play in our midfield, left our defenders exposed, was over the hill, that you were an expert on Sunderland and Chazz was a ****.

Go back and remind yourself of what I said.

I agree I wasn’t. I referred to his performance in the PL and I made that very clear. I also thought we needed someone better to drive the midfield, I still do. He has done okay and I won’t denigrate that for a cheap point - I’m pleased he is able to enjoy his season.
I thought his mojo had left him in respect of dead balls - I’m far from convinced it hasn’t. I thought that in a decent midfield he might be the weakness- we haven’t got a decent midfield and I’m can’t qualify my opinion because of that.
In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is King - not you, GLP, but perhaps Larsson, in a decent team and a much better Championship (which we have experienced) would not stand up to scrutiny.
I have never made comment on this for many months, as I appreciate that every dog has it daub- even old dogs learning nearly new tricks.![]()
I believe you actually said he wasn't good enough to play in our midfield, left our defenders exposed, was over the hill, that you were an expert on Sunderland and Chazz was a ****.![]()
So he got one thing spot on then...![]()
I believe you actually said he wasn't good enough to play in our midfield, left our defenders exposed, was over the hill, that you were an expert on Sunderland and Chazz was a ****.![]()

So he got one thing spot on then...![]()
Yeah, he does know a lot about Sunderland!
He's a bloody mackem.
I believe you actually said he wasn't good enough to play in our midfield, left our defenders exposed, was over the hill, that you were an expert on Sunderland and Chazz was a ****.![]()
As usual, your recollection isn’t spot on, or was it a joke? In which case, arf...
1 in 5 aint bad aye Chazz?I believe you actually said he wasn't good enough to play in our midfield, left our defenders exposed, was over the hill, that you were an expert on Sunderland and Chazz was a ****.![]()
It was supposed to humourous, though it's also fairly accurate (my memory might be ****e, but there's nowt wrong with my ability to read an old thread).
only the last bit was right.I believe you actually said he wasn't good enough to play in our midfield, left our defenders exposed, was over the hill, that you were an expert on Sunderland and Chazz was a ****.![]()
The injuries to Ondrej Mazuch (hamstring) and Markus Henriksen (ankle) both described as "bad ones" by Adkins.