pudseytiger
Well-Known Member
won't be the first time we've bought a player with a history of injury.Stewart played pre-season for us, it's not like we bought him injured.
won't be the first time we've bought a player with a history of injury.Stewart played pre-season for us, it's not like we bought him injured.
won't be the first time we've bought a player with a history of injury.
Doesn't seem to have had one at Spurs or Liverpool.
Liverpool loaned him out three times, two of those loans were cancelled due to injury.
Which is clearly one of the main reasons that we bought him...Liverpool loaned him out three times, two of those loans were cancelled due to injury.
As far as I can see he had one ankle injury back in 2016 but that was the only one. As he only missed a month I don't think it was too severe. I know when I did mine badly I was out for a year and it still troubles me, but I can't imagine an injury causing a month of lay-off would be too long lasting.
Not enough communication if you ask meIt's very quiet on the Ryan and Moses front, they were both seeing specialists last week, would have thought an update would have been given.
There's no way slut would play an. Injured player.Seems like Stewart is being labelled a sick-note already. He got a slight injury, as all players do, and due to the fact that we don't have enough players Slutsky was forced to play him before he was fit. Judge him after he's actually had an appropriate recovery time.
They aren't available tomorrow night, alas.It's very quiet on the Ryan and Moses front, they were both seeing specialists last week, would have thought an update would have been given.
It's obviously not good news, releasing would do no one any good.It's very quiet on the Ryan and Moses front, they were both seeing specialists last week, would have thought an update would have been given.
It's obviously not good news, releasing would do no one any good.
Even with one specialist saying he shouldn't play is a worry. That's all it takes to be honest.