Sorry mate but that's a bit deluded imo
He won't be going anywhere for 40 though
The Virgil Van Dijk Stays at Southampton Thread
- Thread starter Beef
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Sorry mate but that's a bit deluded imo
He won't be going anywhere for 40 though
It's their version of a [HASHTAG]#meltdown[/HASHTAG] , they are [HASHTAG]#fuming[/HASHTAG]
There are three ways this can go.
1. He is talked down from his tree and returns to the fold for at least one season.
2. He becomes a complete arsehole and we sell him for a good price (which imo is 45/50 mill).
3. Some idiotic club (but not Liverpool) offer seriously stupid money (excess of 60 mill) and we pack his bags for him.
1. He is talked down from his tree and returns to the fold for at least one season.
2. He becomes a complete arsehole and we sell him for a good price (which imo is 45/50 mill).
3. Some idiotic club (but not Liverpool) offer seriously stupid money (excess of 60 mill) and we pack his bags for him.
Imagine if he still ended up there
This board would go full on nuclear
Nah. I don't really care where he ends up if he goes. Just think he'd be far better off at Chelsea/City.
Sorry mate but that's a bit deluded imo
He won't be going anywhere for 40 though
I don't think so, it's what we've asked for.
It's going to take a stupid fee like that to allow us even the slightest consideration.
Just because Liverpool used their returning customer speed dial and Les hasnt picked up on the first attempt you can't then go straight to the player. He was probably just on lunch.
Indeed, I thought that. If logic had been invented by football fans, Aristotle wouldn't have been a hero.
So you're setting the price TLL.? Value and price have little in common. If Saints don't want to sell then VVD could be priced at £100M. £70M is perfectly reasonable.Sorry mate but that's a bit deluded imo
He won't be going anywhere for 40 though
My standpoint throughout hasn't changed. I'd happily pay 50mil.
Anything more than that is plain madness at this stage in his career after such an injury.
Yes he's one of the best CB's in the PL. But he's not at a 70mil level... but let's be honest here.. who is? No-one!
Silly season is happening. This summer is going to be pure madness.
Man City just bought a GK for 35mil that's had 1 season as a number 1 ffs
Man City set the bar for CB's last season when they paid £50 million for John Stones. By that reckoning, Virgil is worth £100 million+.My standpoint throughout hasn't changed. I'd happily pay 50mil.
Anything more than that is plain madness at this stage in his career after such an injury.
Yes he's one of the best CB's in the PL. But he's not at a 70mil level... but let's be honest here.. who is? No-one!
Silly season is happening. This summer is going to be pure madness.
Man City just bought a GK for 35mil that's had 1 season as a number 1 ffs
Then he should have told him to keep well out of it and leave it to him...should never have let his client meet up with another club's manager directly.
http://www.skysports.com/football/n...jk-fee-for-manchester-city-to-consider-buying
What do we have to say for people to realise that we don't care we don't want to sell and therefore we don't have to do anything?
What do we have to say for people to realise that we don't care we don't want to sell and therefore we don't have to do anything?
- Status
Similar threads
