SMC groundsmen gone

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
dennisboothstash said:
I stand shoulder to shoulder with OLM on this important issue

Tunnock's Caramel Wafers are rubbish
Click to expand...

They do have a worthwhile use.

The greedy **** in the office, who thinks it ok to take other people's food from the communal tea room fridge, can be discouraged from doing so with a TCW.

Unlike most other snack bars their unsealed presentation makes them easy to unwrap & slowly drench in a Denatonium Benzoate solution before carefully rewrapping & leaving in the fridge for the thieving **** to help himself to.

It was a sight to behold & he never used the excuse "if it's been there over a day anyone can have it" again. The ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howden Tigress, dennisboothstash, Kempton and 1 other person
Sir Cheshire Ben said:
They do have a worthwhile use.

The greedy **** in the office, who thinks it ok to take other people's food from the communal tea room fridge, can be discouraged from doing so with a TCW.

Unlike most other snack bars their unsealed presentation makes them easy to unwrap & slowly drench in a Denatonium Benzoate solution before carefully rewrapping & leaving in the fridge for the thieving **** to help himself to.

It was a sight to behold & he never used the excuse "if it's been there over a day anyone can have it" again. The ****.
Click to expand...

OT but I've never understood why people do that. You must get it in most workplaces but what goes through someone's mind when they know it's not theirs but still decide it's fair game to eat what someone else has brought in?

Crucifixion's too good for 'em.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the_jiggler, Kempton, PLT and 1 other person
Bum_Chinned_Crab said:
OT but I've never understood why people do that. You must get it in most workplaces but what goes through someone's mind when they know it's not theirs but still decide it's fair game to eat what someone else has brought in?

Crucifixion's too good for 'em.
Click to expand...
Crucifixion?

Yes.

Good, first door on the left one cross each...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrisbaneTiger, Sir Cheshire Ben and bum_chinned_crab
Dick Lexic said:
Internal staffing matters should never be lumbered on Marco Silva. I'm amazed his name his attached to this and even more so that he has been questioned about it by the BBC. Beggars belief.
Click to expand...

Presumably it's because of a rumour. Wasn't someone on here saying something about it the other day?
 
Bum_Chinned_Crab said:
OT but I've never understood why people do that. You must get it in most workplaces but what goes through someone's mind when they know it's not theirs but still decide it's fair game to eat what someone else has brought in?

Crucifixion's too good for 'em.
Click to expand...
To wind people up. Keeps the office environment bubbling. Then I start the rumours
 
Sir Cheshire Ben said:
They do have a worthwhile use.

The greedy **** in the office, who thinks it ok to take other people's food from the communal tea room fridge, can be discouraged from doing so with a TCW.

Unlike most other snack bars their unsealed presentation makes them easy to unwrap & slowly drench in a Denatonium Benzoate solution before carefully rewrapping & leaving in the fridge for the thieving **** to help himself to.

It was a sight to behold & he never used the excuse "if it's been there over a day anyone can have it" again. The ****.
Click to expand...
<laugh>
 
Barchullona said:
So, can City Man and Happy can now accept it happened?
Click to expand...
What?

In what way have I denied anything about this?

My contributions to this thread have been to organise jumpers for goalposts, which were happily not required. A simple request for more information in response to post suggesting the poster had more information. Was ignored obviously. I say obviously, he had **** all of course as usual and is full of ****.

I have then commented on the Black Widow, Babs and finally was mortally offended by both Lambo and Dennis, who are clearly not right in the head.

The honourable thing would be an apology from you.
 
Happy Tiger said:
What?

In what way have I denied anything about this?

My contributions to this thread have been to organise jumpers for goalposts, which were happily not required. A simple request for more information in response to post suggesting the poster had more information. Was ignored obviously. I say obviously, he had **** all of course as usual and is full of ****.

I have then commented on the Black Widow, Babs and finally was mortally offended by both Lambo and Dennis, who are clearly not right in the head.

The honourable thing would be an apology from you.
Click to expand...

Your default position is that everything about the Allams are spurious, unfounded rumours.

Even if there was anything to apologise about, which there isn't, my motto of "Never explain, never apologise" would prevent it.

I
 
Barchullona said:
Your default position is that everything about the Allams are spurious, unfounded rumours.

Even if there was anything to apologise about, which there isn't, my motto of "Never explain, never apologise" would prevent it.

I
Click to expand...
Shows a waeakness in a man when they can't apologise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back