New owner confirmed…

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
originallambrettaman said:
He owns no part of Hull City, the SMC, or Allamhouse, so none are his assets, even if there was no pre-nup.

And a pre-nup determines what happens in the event of a split anyway.
Click to expand...

Yeah I know, that why I said if he didn't make her sign a pre nup.

But if he has none of the assets as you say then the whole point made was pointless anyway,
 
Sir Cheshire Ben said:
Just had a courtesy call from Hull City Tigers enquiring if there were specific reasons I'd not done business with them for a while.

It remained pleasant throughout the whole 30 minute summary of reasons.

Poor lad.
Click to expand...
They've never called me. Maybe because I sent my Hull City Tigers pass renewal form back in pieces, along with with some of my thoughts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sir Cheshire Ben
Sir Cheshire Ben said:
Just had a courtesy call from Hull City Tigers enquiring if there were specific reasons I'd not done business with them for a while.

It remained pleasant throughout the whole 30 minute summary of reasons.

Poor lad.
Click to expand...

Funny that I had a call earlier as well from them asking if I was interested in taking up the five for four game special their running .. again kept it pleasant .. not the lads fault his employers are twats
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
Blaknamberblood said:
Funny that I had a call earlier as well from them asking if I was interested in taking up the five for four game special their running .. again kept it pleasant .. not the lads fault his employers are twats
Click to expand...

That's how he started with me. I asked what the concession price was. He confirmed the club didn't do concessions. "& that's why we're no longer doing business"

He then ran through a survey they'd been asked to compile to try & find out the reasons why people were staying away & what would need to be done for me to return.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fingertips
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
TIGERSCAVE said:
Its about time this thread got going again.. our position is down to one ****...
Click to expand...

Problem is every time we win people get all fickle and pretend everything's OK off the pitch. One week they want firm protests, the next week it's "Oh Silva's doing a good job so let's get behind him and the team".

We were assured by the apologists that selling Livermore was a great deal, a masterstroke by the wily Ehab. He wasn't that good anyway remember. Now he's making the England squad and beating Arsenal a few weeks later. No comments on that brainwave now though. People are far too keen to give the Allams the benefit of the doubt when they've proven time and time again that they're running the club based on spiting the fans. They openly admitted so and even despite that, people still find reasons not to believe it and to undermine those who oppose. Then when we start losing again they expect those people to protest on their behalf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cortez91, dennisboothstash, Kempton and 7 others
PLT said:
Problem is every time we win people get all fickle and pretend everything's OK off the pitch. One week they want firm protests, the next week it's "Oh Silva's doing a good job so let's get behind him and the team".

We were assured by the apologists that selling Livermore was a great deal, a masterstroke by the wily Ehab. He wasn't that good anyway remember. Now he's making the England squad and beating Arsenal a few weeks later. No comments on that brainwave now though. People are far too keen to give the Allams the benefit of the doubt when they've proven time and time again that they're running the club based on spiting the fans. They openly admitted so and even despite that, people still find reasons not to believe it and to undermine those who oppose. Then when we start losing again they expect those people to protest on their behalf.
Click to expand...

Who were these apologists who assured you selling Livermore was a great deal?
 
PLT said:
Problem is every time we win people get all fickle and pretend everything's OK off the pitch. One week they want firm protests, the next week it's "Oh Silva's doing a good job so let's get behind him and the team".

We were assured by the apologists that selling Livermore was a great deal, a masterstroke by the wily Ehab. He wasn't that good anyway remember. Now he's making the England squad and beating Arsenal a few weeks later. No comments on that brainwave now though. People are far too keen to give the Allams the benefit of the doubt when they've proven time and time again that they're running the club based on spiting the fans. They openly admitted so and even despite that, people still find reasons not to believe it and to undermine those who oppose. Then when we start losing again they expect those people to protest on their behalf.
Click to expand...

You do realise 'backing the team' isn't the same as saying everything's OK off the pitch, considering the team is on the pitch?
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
..Exactly. :emoticon-0112-wonde

So when people say they want to focus on supporting the team it isn't the same thing as saying they think everything is ok off the field.
Click to expand...

Obviously no one just says it out of the blue. It's often been said in opposition to those people trying to protest against the shambles off the pitch. "Why don't they just support the team." Wow what a novel idea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back